“Peter Pan” is Unmasked as Mike Parker

[Moksha]

it seems like a shakedown.

How many other Christian churches engage in this shameful practice?

I challenge any Mormon to name one.

The closest equivalent would be Scientology continuing to charge for audits but refusing to remove any Thetans.

With TV ministries, you just know their requests for money have been broadcast even if your cable is down.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

[Text deleted, UR 7, RI]

Please do not post any in real life information about a forum member that the member has not posted here.

[Text deleted, UR 7, 8. We take protection of those who choose to post anonymously very seriously. When we delete something under UR 7, please do not continue to post or discuss the deleted information. If you have a question, please shoot me a PM.

Thanks,

RI]

- Doc

[Marcus]

Philo, I have been laughing over this nonstop since I read it. I don’t know if it was autocorrect or all you, but in my opinion, this is the single best description of the Interpreter process since it was called the Playground Peer Review.

That does my heart good you enjoyed it so much! It just popped into my head so I typed it out.

Well done, then!!! I am very glad you did. You are a happy person, and your happiness is infectious. It is a gift you have, and I am glad to know of it. You have lifted my spirits many times. Thank you.

Peerless Review at the Interpreter. It says so much!

[Res Ipsa]

That does my heart good you enjoyed it so much! It just popped into my head so I typed it out.

Well done, then!!! I am very glad you did. You are a happy person, and your happiness is infectious. It is a gift you have, and I am glad to know of it. You have lifted my spirits many times. Thank you.

Peerless Review at the Interpreter. It says so much!

Amen. That is the perfect description of Philo. And the new term he coined is perfection.

[TwoCumorahFraud]

I visited Peter Pan's blog...silly stuff... never heard of Mike Parker. But in my opinion another spoiled UTAH member who never learned how to defend the Church he belongs to by embracing a fake geography theory created in 1917 by Louis Edward Hills, a member of the First Quorum of Seventy, of the RLDS Church; died in 1925.

During the stay-at-home, plandemic, I found the entire history on line, including his three books and four maps, scanned by Google and two organizations in and near Independence, Missouri. I purchased in 2021 two of his 1924 books via Amazon, first and second editions, includes the "Mormon's Map" coined by John L. Sorenson. Created and copyrighted by L.E. Hills, who died in 1925. Copyrights have expired, his books and maps are in the Public Domain. Anyone can resell them and they have. But the Meso intellectual claim Joseph Smith embraced the theory because of some John Lloyd Stephens books, a historical disconnect between 1844 and 1917. But no one ever accused them of being intelligent.

Ever hear of the Hill Cumorah Expedition Team? Look it up. Online site and Facebook. RLDS (now CofC and Restoration Branch). As well BOMF.org.

Plagiarized by F.A.R.M.S., Sorenson, Welch, Magleby, Gardner, Peterson and those associated with their organizations. Completely fake Book of Mormon geography, plagiarized, never gave credit to its creator: Louis Edward Hills, of Independence, Missouri.

[drumdude]

DCP seems to have acknowledged what you point out, that the idea wasn’t original to them. He just doesn’t care.

As we’ve discovered on this board, DCP has a nasty habit of shamelessly plagiarizing sources without attribution.

[Marcus]

By the way and on a quite distinct topic, here’s a new entry on the Neville-Neville Land blog that puts me in mind of Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There: “Rian Nelson posts antisemitic comments; Jonathan Neville blames Daniel Peterson for pointing this out”
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... nesis.html

just to clarify, this is daniel C. Peterson, advertising an entry on Mike Parker's blog. Both peterson and parker have perpetuated the story that parker's blog is written by richard nygren, an imaginary black LDS apologist.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

By the way and on a quite distinct topic, here’s a new entry on the Neville-Neville Land blog that puts me in mind of Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There: “Rian Nelson posts antisemitic comments; Jonathan Neville blames Daniel Peterson for pointing this out”
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... nesis.html

just to clarify, this is daniel C. Peterson, advertising an entry on Mike Parker's blog. Both peterson and parker have perpetuated the story that parker's blog is written by richard nygren, an imaginary black LDS apologist.

You must be talking about Mike Parker who currently teaches an adult LDS religion class in the Hurricane, Utah area who posts anonymous vitriolic hit pieces against fellow Latter-day Saints? Yikes.

- Doc

[Res Ipsa]

By the way and on a quite distinct topic, here’s a new entry on the Neville-Neville Land blog that puts me in mind of Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There: “Rian Nelson posts antisemitic comments; Jonathan Neville blames Daniel Peterson for pointing this out”
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... nesis.html

just to clarify, this is daniel C. Peterson, advertising an entry on Mike Parker's blog. Both peterson and parker have perpetuated the story that parker's blog is written by richard nygren, an imaginary black LDS apologist.

I’ve seen an entry on Peterson’s blog where he said that Boylen said that Peter Pan was Nygren, that Peterson had not been able to find Nygren, but he hoped he was real. Do we have any instance of Peterson starting or implying that Nygren is Peter Pan?

[Marcus]

DCP just gave himself away...

DanielPeterson Stephen Smoot
2 hours ago
Stephen Smoot: "P.S., my understanding from listening to Robert Boylan's interview with Spencer Kraus is that "Peter Pan" is some fellow down in Alabama named Richard Nygren. But whoever this Mr. Nygren may be I cannot say. I have never met him, nor have I ever corresponded with him online."

I've never so much as heard of him. I briefly looked for him online, but found nothing. I'd like to think that he exists, though.

My bet is that he's one of my multiple personalities, just as you are.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 5928642929

But in the blog entry posted before that comment...

They think that it’s Steve Smoot — who is something of an obsession with my very obsessive anonymous Malevolent Stalker — or that it’s Dan Peterson, or that it’s Steve Smoot at the direction of Dan Peterson. Actually, it’s none of those. (I myself learned only a few months ago who it is, because s/he told me; until then I was almost as much in the dark on the subject as my Stalker is.)

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... curse.html

So? Peterson was contacted a few months ago by the actual blogger, but 2 hours ago says he has "never so much as heard of him"?

Sure, DCP. Sure.

Intriguing. I would add a few pieces of data:

In April 2021, Peterson wrote:

Incidentally too, although I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the estimable “Peter Pan” is somebody with whom I’m acquainted, I don’t know his (or her) identity, and I have absolutely no connection with the Neville-Neville Land blog.

In May 2021, Peterson wrote:

“Peter Pan,” the principal figure behind the valuable Neville-Neville Land blog — whose identity I do not know, although I wouldn’t be surprised if s/he were someone with whom I’m acquainted — contacted me by email late last night to tell me that Mr. Jonathan Neville has posted an entry about the film on one of his approximately 3,437 blogs.

In September 2021, Peterson wrote:

Incidentally, the person behind the Neville-Neville Land blog recently identified himself/herself to me. As I had suspected, it was someone that I knew. But I hadn’t known who it was. I’m grateful for his/her service.

What are we to conclude here?