MAD mod names

Post by **_moksha** » Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:06 pm

If ever the MAD mods tire of their paganistic Greek God naming system, I would like to suggest a few other possible current cultural character names for them:

Perfect for Juliann's character

Very good possibility for someone

Dan G.?

A lover of ribs and donuts?

Too gentle looking for Pahoran's temperament

Maybe you could think of other possibilities?

Post by **_Brackite** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:02 am

LOL! This is very funny. Thanks for the laughs, Moksha!

Post by **_Sam Harris** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:06 am

Moksha I love you. May God bless you and keep you.

Post by **_Gazelam** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:09 am

Mr. Scratch?

Like the character in Winnie the pooh, lots said, but nothing of value and in the end merely amuseing.

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:44 am

Gazelam, are you insinuating that Mister Scratch is a moderator at MA&D?

Post by **_Sam Harris** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:26 pm

Gazelam wrote:

Mr. Scratch?

Like the character in Winnie the pooh, lots said, but nothing of value and in the end merely amuseing.

We could say that about your endless testimony, complete with powerpoint graphics.

Post by **_Gazelam** » Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:26 pm

Sorry, no hes not a mod, (obviously) just making a joke towards Mr. Scratch and his style of posting.

My bad

Post by **_Mister Scratch** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:04 pm

Gazelam wrote:

Mr. Scratch?

Like the character in Winnie the pooh, lots said, but nothing of value and in the end merely amuseing.

Aw, snap, Gaz! What a wicked and totally clever rejoinder! You know, in all seriousness, I have to wonder why this little jabs from people such as you, Wade, and Loran tend to be so completely banal and cartoonish.

In any case, I will take your post to be evidence that I have given you a thorough and effective buttkicking, as you've failed to respond to any of my posts. This, apparently, is the best you have to offer. Well done, Gaz.

Post by **_Gazelam** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:18 am

I didn't respond to your former posts solely because I haven't felt like it.

And for you to have "kicked my butt" your post would have had to of had some substance to it, which from reading a variety of your former posts you have never been able to do. Your posts never rise above the grade school "he said, she said". Obviously you had a very enjoyable time on the old playground growing up and have had a hard time moving past that.

Mormonism is far more than disputed historical statements. Theres another part of it called the gospel. Maybe if you spent more time studying that than the sensational gossip you'd gain a more mature insight in how the grownups act.

Gaz

Post by **_Mister Scratch** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:04 pm

Gazelam wrote:I didn't respond to your former posts solely because I haven't felt like it.

Quite a lame excuse.

And for you to have "kicked my butt" your post would have had to of had some substance to it, which from reading a variety of your former posts you have never been able to do. Your posts never rise above the grade school "he said, she said". Obviously you had a very enjoyable time on the old playground growing up and have had a hard time moving past that.

Mormonism is far more than disputed historical statements. Theres another part of it called the gospel. Maybe if you spent more time studying that than the sensational gossip you'd gain a more mature insight in how the grownups act.

Gaz

"How grownups act"? What, you mean like posting pictures of cartoon owls? Once again, Gaz, well done!