I don't see, in any case, how such "feelings" provide them ethical cover for calling others sociopaths, pigs, perverts, liars, hacks, absurdities, brain-dead robots, psychopaths, and the like, simply because those others hold different views on religion than they do. Having been called all of those things, and many more (some of them obscene), by people there who don't even know me, I will need some convincing before I believe that this is all completely justified and quite wholesome.
Good heavens. Are his feelings hurt? Has the Great One, Strong and Mighty, fallen prey to "feelings"?
DCP is skating on pretty thin ice here, in my opinion. After all, I have been called "a brazen liar," a "hypocrite," a "coward," an "idiot," a "scumbag," a "paranoid fool," a "schizophrenic," a "hate-monger," among other things, all by the supposedly angelic TBMs from FAIR/MAD. Both sides are guilty of namecalling. Only one side, however, tries to make a case for its moral superiority in this regard. I wonder why that is?
Bond...James Bond wrote:Actually we just hired a new man. Kind of a grouch, not much personality, but he sees everything!
I don't mean to derail this thread or sound like a perv, but every time I see that "all-seeing eye" (whether in a "Lord of the Rings" movie or some picture like above), I think of a flaming vagina.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Bond...James Bond wrote:Actually we just hired a new man. Kind of a grouch, not much personality, but he sees everything!
I don't mean to derail this thread or sound like a perv, but every time I see that "all-seeing eye" (whether in a "Lord of the Rings" movie or some picture like above), I think of a flaming vagina.
The flaming part is an STD. Or part of the continuing Hollywood liberal conspiracy to get our minds on sex.
What are they going to do? Throw you in derailment jail?
Last edited by Anonymous on Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Bond...James Bond wrote:Actually we just hired a new man. Kind of a grouch, not much personality, but he sees everything!
I don't mean to derail this thread or sound like a perv, but every time I see that "all-seeing eye" (whether in a "Lord of the Rings" movie or some picture like above), I think of a flaming vagina.
This could well be another sore spot for Juliann to write about at MAD.
Bond...James Bond wrote:Actually we just hired a new man. Kind of a grouch, not much personality, but he sees everything!
I don't mean to derail this thread or sound like a perv, but every time I see that "all-seeing eye" (whether in a "Lord of the Rings" movie or some picture like above), I think of a flaming vagina.
This could well be another sore spot for Juliann to write about at MAD.
OK....The mention of Juliann, sore spot, and vaginal STD just gave me a very bad visual.
I don't mean to derail this thread or sound like a perv, but every time I see that "all-seeing eye" (whether in a "Lord of the Rings" movie or some picture like above), I think of a flaming vagina.
You and your wife must have incredible sex. I think my significant other and I do pretty well in that department, but my vagina has never burst into flames. I'm feeling cheated.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
beastie wrote:You and your wife must have incredible sex. I think my significant other and I do pretty well in that department, but my vagina has never burst into flames.
That's what I've thought all these years ... now, Mr. Bond has me wondering whether it's really just been an STD, instead. ;)
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Speaking of 'fire' and 'flames', did anyone else see that report that said 'redheads' would be extinct by the year 2100 (i think that was the year)?
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
Speaking of 'fire' and 'flames', did anyone else see that report that said 'redheads' would be extinct by the year 2100 (i think that was the year)?
I don't think I've heard that yet. Was it written on the missing 116 pages?
Serious Edit: What's the basis for this? Was there a newsstory or something?
Bond
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07