What's with the Initials?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

What's with the Initials?

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

What is it about the LDS and their 3rd initial? It's really weird.

President Gordon B. Hinckley
President Thomas S. Monson
President Boyd K. Packer
Elder L. Tom Perry
President James E. Faust
Elder Russell M. Nelson
Elder Dallin H. Oaks
Elder M. Russell Ballard
Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin
Elder Richard G. Scott
Elder Robert D. Hales
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland
Elder Henry B. Eyring
Elder Dieter F. Uchtdorf
Elder David A. Bednar

Or to get out of the leadership, Daniel C. Peterson? Plus there are many others throughout LDS history who aren't content with two names. It didn't used to be this way. Brigham Young and Joseph Smith were content, why do all these guys need to be Mr. John Q. Priesthood?

Anyone have a clue on this phenomenon? Are they some kind of key to finding Aztec gold? Can we fill in the initial with a random word if we don't know what they actually mean? What the hell?

Bond....James T. Bond

Edit: Personally I think these guys could spice their names up by filling in the initial with an outrageous name. Wouldn't Liverpool Tom Perry be alot better than L. Tom Perry? How about Boyd Kalamazoo Packer? Maverick Russell Ballard?
Dieter Falafel Uchdorf? Daniel Cantaloupe Peterson? I could go all night.
Last edited by Anonymous on Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Maybe the initials are strategicaly made so as to make an acrostic when lined up properly--something along the lines of METCALFISNOTBUTTHEAD or maybe THECHURCHISTRUE

On a slightly more serious note, I generally try to use my middle initial to distinguish my name from other people as I happen to have a fairly common name (not unlike Joseph Smith). The initial helps a little bit. I'm not so sure I'm following the prophets' examples so much as following the example of my hero, Homer J Simpson.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

You are right about the initials and John Q. Public deserves an answer either ASAP or at least on the QT, at least IMHO.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

asbestosman wrote:Maybe the initials are strategicaly made so as to make an acrostic when lined up properly--something along the lines of METCALFISNOTBUTTHEAD or maybe THECHURCHISTRUE

On a slightly more serious note, I generally try to use my middle initial to distinguish my name from other people as I happen to have a fairly common name (not unlike Joseph Smith). The initial helps a little bit. I'm not so sure I'm following the prophets' examples so much as following the example of my hero, Homer J Simpson.


Remember Homer's real middle name? J=Jay
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

moksha wrote:You are right about the initials and John Q. Public deserves an answer either ASAP or at least on the QT, at least IMHO.


LOL, U R GR8. MI-6 Thanx U.

B...JB
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by _silentkid »

When speaking with TBM's, I like to mix the names up a bit: Gordon B. Monson, James E. Nelson, Dallan H. Eyring...you get the idea. The key is doing it with a straight face, in total seriousness.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

silentkid wrote:When speaking with TBM's, I like to mix the names up a bit[.]


Speaking of "mixing up the names a bit," remember when someone on RFM called him "Gordon B. Stinkley?"
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

Dr. Shades wrote:
silentkid wrote:When speaking with TBM's, I like to mix the names up a bit[.]


Speaking of "mixing up the names a bit," remember when someone on RFM called him "Gordon B. Stinkley?"


I've seen a lot of those:

Gordon B. Wrinkley
Boyd K. Slacker
Boyd Fudge Packer
Dallin Hoax

I can't remember any more off the top of my head.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Who Knows wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:
silentkid wrote:When speaking with TBM's, I like to mix the names up a bit[.]


Speaking of "mixing up the names a bit," remember when someone on RFM called him "Gordon B. Stinkley?"


I've seen a lot of those:

Gordon B. Wrinkley
Boyd K. Slacker
Boyd Fudge Packer
Dallin Hoax

I can't remember any more off the top of my head.


Bring'em Young

I daresay there are a ton of these on Salamander.
Last edited by Anonymous on Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

It seems like it all started with Joseph F. Smith. All the "prophets" before him only had 2 names, and I'm sure JFS used the middle initial to differentiate him from THE Joseph Smith. Not sure why those who followed him felt it necessary to use the middle initial though. Wouldn't it be funny if Heber J. Grant just assumed this was a new rule and added the middle initial to his name and everyone after him followed suit. It all started from a misunderstanding caused by Joseph F. Smith.
Post Reply