Just ran into a blatant morg

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

Bryan Inks wrote:Did I read this correctly?

Did Wade just admit to being a bigot?


I would have thought a more correct reading of my generic post would have engendered introspective questions rather than questions about me.

Be that as it may, given my own healthy introspection and honest self-appraisal, I must admit that there have been, and to some degree still are, areas of insecurities and irrational prejudices in me that would be in the interest of all parties (especially me) to acknowledge, improve, and correct. I have certainly noticed, since I began working on these issues a while back, a marked improvement in the quality of my life and a more positive influence I seem to have on and with others. I have been made a much better person for it.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

wenglund wrote:I would have thought a more correct reading of my generic post would have engendered introspective questions rather than questions about me.


I would have thought that Bryan's post would have engendered introspective questions instead of questions about Bryan's reading comprehension. What exactly is a "correct" reading of your post, Wade?

Be that as it may, given my own healthy introspection and honest self-appraisal, I must admit that there have been, and to some degree still are, areas of insecurities and irrational prejudices in me that would be in the interest of all parties (especially me) to acknowledge, improve, and correct.


I would agree. We all have room for improvement, myself included. I know, far be it from me to be self-critical and introspective. ;)

I have certainly noticed, since I began working on these issues a while back, a marked improvement in the quality of my life and a more positive influence I seem to have on and with others. I have been made a much better person for it.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


I feel a lot better about life for a variety of reasons. Lately, I feel better that I'm not taking your comments personally. That's a start for me.

Anyway, back to the OP, I'm not criticizing another person, but rather the attitude that is so immediately dismissive of things that don't square with one's beliefs. I've been guilty of that, but hopefully, I'm getting better.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

Runtu wrote:
Bryan Inks wrote:
Did I read this correctly?

Did Wade just admit to being a bigot?


I think he's calling us hypocritical, actually.


Actually, Bryon was somewhat correct. As indicated in my last post, my innitial comments on this thread were designed to envoke introspection, and as such I viewed it as me speaking about myself. And, what I was saying about myself was not so much judgemental or accusatory, but rather evaluative and perscriptive. I saw my past self, and to some degree my current self, in the way that Sono Hito spoke about the woman he interacted with, and I determined for myself that all would be better served were I to find a more loving, valuing, and respectful approach.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

wenglund wrote:
Runtu wrote:
Bryan Inks wrote:
Did I read this correctly?

Did Wade just admit to being a bigot?


I think he's calling us hypocritical, actually.


Actually, Bryon was somewhat correct. As indicated in my last post, my innitial comments on this thread were designed to envoke introspection, and as such I viewed it as me speaking about myself. And, what I was saying about myself was not so much judgemental or accusatory, but rather evaluative and perscriptive. I saw my past self, and to some degree my current self, in the way that Sono Hito spoke about the woman he interacted with, and I determined for myself that all would be better served were I to find a more loving, valuing, and respectful approach.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


Come on, Wade. When have you ever been spurred to "introspection" by anyone else's remarks? You had to come to in on your own, and so does everyone else. So your "lead by example" blather is really more hypocrisy on your part.
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

Well, Wade, for what it's worth, I agree with your comments here:

It seems to be a human trait to criticize, chide, and ridicule others about things we tend to dislike most about ourselves.

I don't know that it is a very functional human trait, but I suspect that we do it because there is at least some pay-off (be it a false sense of superiority, or a convenient way of directing attention away from our own vulnerabilities and perceived flaws, etc.)

Imagine how better off we all would be were our efforts (particularly those of a public nature) were focused more on promoting mutual love, value, and respect, rather than criticism, chiding, and ridicule.

Just a thought.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


I know...we better make sure that the sky isn't falling...I've agreed with one of Plutarch's statements and one of Wade's statements in the same week! LOL

Seriously...Wade...if you have a moment...read my comments on the "For Plutarch" thread. You might find it interesting.

;)
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

liz3564 wrote:Well, Wade, for what it's worth, I agree with your comments here:

I know...we better make sure that the sky isn't falling...I've agreed with one of Plutarch's statements and one of Wade's statements in the same week! LOL

Seriously...Wade...if you have a moment...read my comments on the "For Plutarch" thread. You might find it interesting.
;)


I had read them, and they were not only interesting, but they resonated with me as well. In fact, I thought it sufficient enough in itself not to add follow-up comments of my own.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Last edited by Gadianton on Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

wenglund wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Well, Wade, for what it's worth, I agree with your comments here:

I know...we better make sure that the sky isn't falling...I've agreed with one of Plutarch's statements and one of Wade's statements in the same week! LOL

Seriously...Wade...if you have a moment...read my comments on the "For Plutarch" thread. You might find it interesting.
;)


I had read ithem, and it not only was interesting, but it resonated with me. In fact, I thought it sufficient enough in itself not to add follow-up comments of my own.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


Thanks, Wade! :)
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

wenglund wrote:
Runtu wrote:
Bryan Inks wrote:
Did I read this correctly?

Did Wade just admit to being a bigot?


I think he's calling us hypocritical, actually.


Actually, Bryon was somewhat correct. As indicated in my last post, my innitial comments on this thread were designed to envoke introspection, and as such I viewed it as me speaking about myself. And, what I was saying about myself was not so much judgemental or accusatory, but rather evaluative and perscriptive. I saw my past self, and to some degree my current self, in the way that Sono Hito spoke about the woman he interacted with, and I determined for myself that all would be better served were I to find a more loving, valuing, and respectful approach.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


That's good to hear, because I had assumed that you were simply trying to minimize criticism of the Mormon woman and imply criticism of the OP.

So, anyway, while you're on an intropsection high, does this mean you're forsaking your "counseling for ex-mormons" project? I'm asking because the "suggestions wanted" thread is sinking to the bottom and I'd asked for your input on something that hasn't been responded to. Thanks, Lucretia
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

Lucretia MacEvil wrote: That's good to hear, because I had assumed that you were simply trying to minimize criticism of the Mormon woman and imply criticism of the OP.

So, anyway, while you're on an intropsection high, does this mean you're forsaking your "counseling for ex-mormons" project? I'm asking because the "suggestions wanted" thread is sinking to the bottom and I'd asked for your input on something that hasn't been responded to. Thanks, Lucretia


I think my "introspective high" will position me better to facilitate the self-help offered to ex-Mormons and Mormons alike.

I will check the thread you mentioned and respond as best I can.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

Now, come on here. Anyone who worships ancient mythological Norse Gods who spend most of their time drinking mead, fighting and carousing in drunken parties at the Asgard Marriot, and chasing gigantic, poisen spitting serpents (when they're not plotting and scheming against each other following their ancient Greek contemporaries) has only limited credibility when criticising the reiligions of others, don't you think?


Loran
Post Reply