As I suspected, Juliann is posting things out of context, and filling in what she's not posting with bold faced lies:
QUOTE(Sput @ Feb 9 2007, 01:05 PM)
Juliann,
I would post what they call you, but recently they have been fascinated by your nether regions lately so I won't go there. Anyways if you are allowed to, would you be willing to share this story and set any records straight, or would that be against the mod creed? I'm highly interested why they go so far out of there way to go after Damn_G (who I haven't seen here in more then a couple of months) and yourself. Who is Dan_G I hear he is the mastermind behind this boards demise. Where is he? Anyways I think this would be great since my thread is about the stacking of the deck with hypocritical, totalitarian, maniacal moderation team this board needs for LDS to engage the critics. Also while you are at it, why do mods hide their identities? Is it cause they are afraid of being held accountable of their modding habits or is it for practical reasons?
Juliann's response:
My what regions? Dare I ask? The mods were let go so I guess it doesn't matter. As to why we didn't use our names...why don't you use yours? I don't think it is all that hard to figure out. I know Liz went on a jihad after she was shown the door. Now that I think about it...she outed the mods on her other board out of spite so that may have been why Dan just said to heck with it all and redid the whole thing. (I like what he has done, by the way.) Dadof7 was one of the mods and he was bewildered why she would turn on him like that...he considered her a friend. But that is what happens, I guess. Liz came in with a bang...immediately wanting to infiltrate Dr. Shades board....she was already posting there and wanted to set up a sockpuppet. She was told no and wouldn't drop it. She also was the one pushing to contact servers to shut down message boards she thought we didn't want around. (Another board was violating our copyright by posting pages, skin and all.) She was told no to that, too. So it is kind of funny that she "infiltrated" to mod status on the very board she wanted to put out of business. Hopefully, she has found the side she really wants to be on. These are posts from the moderator folder, they aren't emails so they aren't private. I'm going to do this so that it is clear how different the stories become when they get going on MDB. When Liz started spreading tales on multiple message boards after outing all of the mods....and posting private emails I cached a page with her actual words on it for comparison.
I would like to address a few things here as far as sequence, etc. First of all, for the record, have I EVER revealed the names of the old FAIR board here? I have no idea what she is talking about. Have I made "educated guesses" about the new MAD mods? Yes...but she is stating here that I posted a "who's who" list on Shades' board. Shades? Anyone who was on both Shade's old and new boards? Have I posted such a list
to this day?As far as Dadof7 goes....I never betrayed his trust. Were you guys aware he was one of the Mods? Also...he and I exchanged emails after the whole incident regarding the banning, and we are on good terms. I congratulated him on his new job, and even gave him some tips on his resume. So much for "betraying" Dadof7.
As far as the whole copyright issue, and dealings with Kevin's board and Shades' old board....What Juliann conveniently left out of that thread conversation is that both Juliann and Dan went into length telling me about how both Kevin and Shades had violated copyright laws, and was causing possible legal problems for FAIR. My comment, taken in context, was that, if this is really going on (which at that point, I had no reason to doubt that it wasn't...I foolishly TRUSTED Juliann and Dan at this point.), and you really want to do something about it, here are some ways to proceed.
QUOTE
V Full Edit
V Quick Edit
liz3564
Group: Member
Posts: 616
Joined: 3-September 05
Member No.: 2,144
OK...bear with a new Mod here.... wink.gif
Why are we banning Kevin in the first place? Has he been inflammatory? I guess I haven't read that many of his posts. I know he disagrees with people a lot...but I haven't read him actually flame anyone.
Just curious.
There are several processes Kevin could be referring to as far as tunneling IP addresses go. Do you want me to go "incognito" on Mormon Discussions and see if I can find out exactly what process Kevin is talking about? Or is it moot with what Daniel has already done?
OK....this is interesting. Notice that Juliann has conveniently left out Daniel's(Dan G) response. It was at this point that I learned all about the IP banning process which he was feverish about(and, obviously still is).
QUOTE
liz3564 Aug 28 2006, 09:46 AM IP: Private | Post #288|
TechnoNerd
Group: Member
Posts: 616
Joined: 3-September 05
Member No.: 2,144
QUOTE (Aug 28 2006, 09:33 AM)
Also, can we just deal with his hosting service and not Kevin G re: the ceast and desist thing?
From a legal standpoint, if we just deal with the cease and desist issue from his hosting company, they only have the power to prevent it from the site that he authors. (I do, however, think that this should be done. The hosting site getting involved is the fastest way to clip his wings. It will also really tick him off! )
If we cc Kevin on it, then legally, we have informed him that he can't infringe the copyright law by posting partial threads from FAIR on other sites such as Mormon Discussions, etc.
I just had an epiphany. Why don't we email Shades about the copyright infringement? If we really wanted to get nasty, we could go through Shades' hosting company!
Again, my loyalty at the time was with FAIR, and I honestly believed by what Juliann and Dan had told me that Kevin and Shades had both been abominable in their behavior, and that they needed to be stopped or FAIR was in danger of facing legal ramifications. After I had been banned from FAIR, I had a chance to actually have a conversation with Kevin, who gave me the full story. It was one of the reasons I said "yes" when he asked me to help him moderate his board. I gained a true respect for Kevin, and I saw how utterly bizarre the story I had been given by Juliann and Dan was. Kevin, after all, had actual documentation to back him up!
QUOTE
liz3564 Aug 28 2006, 11:15 AM IP: Private | Post #296|
TechnoNerd
Group: Member
Posts: 616
Joined: 3-September 05
Member No.: 2,144
QUOTE (Hypnos @ Aug 28 2006, 10:57 AM)
I don't think its serious enough to get into legalities with them. They are giving us purpose right now to toy with them. Im sure as soon as they get the clue that we do not want them to worry about what is going on at fair they will soon knock it off and we will have almost nothing to do again.
LOL!
OK....Hey...are you as curious as I am about how Kevin is claiming to bypass us? Has that been resolved?
I'm still tempted to go "incognito" to find out.
First of all, notice the time differences listed. It's obvious that there is conversation here being left out. Since I didn't bother to save any of the threads, I can't quote what went on, but this gives you an idea of what Juliann is up to.
You can also note by what I bolded, that Dan did, indeed gain supreme entertainment out of blocking IP's and redirecting threads. (And yes, I do regret showing him how to do the redirect. I think I mentioned that on the old board.)
As far as my offering to find out where the bypass was happening, what you didn't see in the thread conversation...and..it honestly could have happened in PM...I really don't remember now...Dan was all for my finding out what I could, since he was painstakingly blocking as many IP addresses as he could, and engaging anyone else who knew what they were doing to help. He even suggested that I use a different user name than my liz3564 ID to do it.
Again, at the time all of this was going on, I honestly thought that FAIR was playing by the rules, and being legitimate, and that Kevin and Shades were both being underhanded in their tactics. I think they can both tell you that I openly admitted to them that my assumptions based on what I had been told by Dan and Juliann were obviously wrong.
[/b]