Anna Nicole Smith (sorry, I had to)

Post by **_Gazelam** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:42 am

Donald Trump should shave his head, then put his combover in the Smithsonian.

Post by **_Sam Harris** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:29 pm

Dr. Shades wrote:
Britney's head is no larger than anyone else's.

LOL, now you know all heads are not made alike! They come in various shapes and sizes, my little brother's is "S" shaped. Don't ask me how, it just is. My head looks normal sized...until you get to braiding it.

If Brit wanted to shave her head, and no attention was involved, could she have not spent her millions on some clippers from Sally Beauty Supply and done it at home?

It does seem that Daniel was Anna Nicole's sole heir. I don't know how a person can have a will and not change it when a child is born, Dannielyn is about five months old.

I don't turn on the TV much anymore, but my mother says the judge is pretty inane.

It just amazes me that this takes up so much news when there's so much more going on out there...

Post by **_Sam Harris** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:30 pm

Gazelam wrote:Donald Trump should shave his head, then put his combover in the Smithsonian.

Perhaps that will ease up the crowds around the Hope Diamond, so I can finally get a good, long look at it.

Edited for afterthought: The Hope Diamond is in the museum of natural history...is Trump's combover natural hair? Or is it synthetic? Because I think only things having to do with the organic world can go in that particular museum...if it's implants, I'm sure it'll do well in the museum of american history, or one of the art museums...maybe in the abstract art section, next to a mud sculpture or something.

Post by **_Gazelam** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:23 am

I hold with the abstract art suggestion.

Post by **_ajax18** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:14 am

Good grief! I just heard that someone opine that Stern is likely to win custody of the child even though Birkhead is the biological father. This is outrageous! Fathers do not have rights to custody of their own biological children. Family court is so unfair to fathers that it is sickening to even think it has become U.S. law. I have no respect nor love for a country with such laws. Perhaps my life's work will become to use whatever means necessary to change this blatant unfairness. I'd rather die than live under such laws.

Why are these people fighting for this child? Does the winner get a load of cash from Mom's estate?

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:44 am

ajax18 wrote:Why are these people fighting for this child? Does the winner get a load of cash from Mom's estate?

Yes.

Post by **_ajax18** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:57 am

What would be wrong with forcing whoever gets custody to provide receipts for money spent to show that it was spent on this child. Children shouldn't be a means for one adult to live off another as they have been in the past.