? for Ray A
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Johnny will be sad if I don't include his pic:
Okay, ladies. I've been reflecting on this thread since it started and upon close inspection of my candidates I've decided that I notice a disturbing yet mildly interesting trend.
It's clear to me that I've listed a group that can be best characterized as womanizing, fanny shaking, tatooed, earring wearing, quirky (probably booze swilling) dark haired sparkly eyed, somewhat chiseled and talented men. While I do see a representation of intelligence, it's not the type of intelligence of the geek variety that beastie pointed out. The type of intelligence that I think I see, is the ability to transform. Is that wrong?
I think I have a dark side.
Jersey Girl
:-O

Okay, ladies. I've been reflecting on this thread since it started and upon close inspection of my candidates I've decided that I notice a disturbing yet mildly interesting trend.
It's clear to me that I've listed a group that can be best characterized as womanizing, fanny shaking, tatooed, earring wearing, quirky (probably booze swilling) dark haired sparkly eyed, somewhat chiseled and talented men. While I do see a representation of intelligence, it's not the type of intelligence of the geek variety that beastie pointed out. The type of intelligence that I think I see, is the ability to transform. Is that wrong?
I think I have a dark side.
Jersey Girl
:-O
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Okay, ladies. I've been reflecting on this thread since it started and upon close inspection of my candidates I've decided that I notice a disturbing yet mildly interesting trend.
It's clear to me that I've listed a group that can be best characterized as womanizing, fanny shaking, tatooed, earring wearing, quirky (probably booze swilling) dark haired sparkly eyed, somewhat chiseled and talented men. While I do see a representation of intelligence, it's not the type of intelligence of the geek variety that beastie pointed out. The type of intelligence that I think I see, is the ability to transform. Is that wrong?
I think I have a dark side.
Jersey Girl
:-O
Johnny's only fun when he's dressed. I just can't seem to navigate around him, naked. I mean... a guy's gotta have some chest hair on those studly pecs, ya know! (I just do not understand the current trend of waxing every speck of manliness. It's just not right.)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
harmony wrote:Johnny's only fun when he's dressed. I just can't seem to navigate around him, naked. I mean... a guy's gotta have some chest hair on those studly pecs, ya know! (I just do not understand the current trend of waxing every speck of manliness. It's just not right.)
Well if you want chest hair....Sean Connery's your man.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Bond...James Bond wrote:harmony wrote:Johnny's only fun when he's dressed. I just can't seem to navigate around him, naked. I mean... a guy's gotta have some chest hair on those studly pecs, ya know! (I just do not understand the current trend of waxing every speck of manliness. It's just not right.)
Well if you want chest hair....Sean Connery's your man.
There's something to be said for those old 007 movies!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:32 pm
beastie wrote:George Clooney, yes, he's a good one. I always rate him highly. But for some reason he doesn't rev my engines like some others. Maybe he's TOO gorgeous.
He's very intelligent. A thinker. That's one important reason why he's so attractive.
Jersey Girl wrote:Hush up, Fort. You have supplied no evidence for your entry of George Clooney.
I thought it was self-evident. Never seen 'Good Night and Good Luck'?
Oh, and I need to add Viggo Mortensen. I find it astonishing that no one has mentioned him yet.
Lazy research debunked: bcspace x 4 | maklelan x 3 | Coggins7 x 5 (by Mr. Coffee x5) | grampa75 x 1 | whyme x 2 | rcrocket x 2 | Kerry Shirts x 1 | Enuma Elish x 1|
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Fortigurn wrote:beastie wrote:George Clooney, yes, he's a good one. I always rate him highly. But for some reason he doesn't rev my engines like some others. Maybe he's TOO gorgeous.
He's very intelligent. A thinker. That's one important reason why he's so attractive.Jersey Girl wrote:Hush up, Fort. You have supplied no evidence for your entry of George Clooney.
I thought it was self-evident. Never seen 'Good Night and Good Luck'?
Oh, and I need to add Viggo Mortensen. I find it astonishing that no one has mentioned him yet.
When I mentioned evidence, I wanted you to post a photo that best represents your candidate.
Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb