The About-face Continues: DCP & Co. on "The Mormons

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

BOND!

Get your shotglass, i'm bringing Jager...were going to get messed up on Joseph Smiths grave. If this show goes well I'd say that the backlash from Mormon PR will be enough to put a sour taste in the mouth of a great deal of America, at least the upper middle class.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: The About-face Continues: DCP & Co. on "The Mor

Post by _Some Schmo »

Who Knows wrote: Jack Bauer vs. DCP. It's a tough one, but DCP wins out.


Dude... even if this is true, you shouldn't admit it in public. This is a contest between ultra-cool and donut-plump, and you're saying plump wins? Ouch!
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Yoda

Re: The About-face Continues: DCP & Co. on "The Mor

Post by _Yoda »

Some Schmo wrote:
Who Knows wrote: Jack Bauer vs. DCP. It's a tough one, but DCP wins out.


Dude... even if this is true, you shouldn't admit it in public. This is a contest between ultra-cool and donut-plump, and you're saying plump wins? Ouch!


Is it a new "24" this week?

Decisions...decisions. Watching the very sexy Keifer Sutherland, or the special on Mormons which has peaked my curiosity.

I think we'll have to have the DVR working in overdrive.

LOL
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: The About-face Continues: DCP & Co. on "The Mor

Post by _Runtu »

liz3564 wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:
Who Knows wrote: Jack Bauer vs. DCP. It's a tough one, but DCP wins out.


Dude... even if this is true, you shouldn't admit it in public. This is a contest between ultra-cool and donut-plump, and you're saying plump wins? Ouch!


Is it a new "24" this week?

Decisions...decisions. Watching the very sexy Keifer Sutherland, or the special on Mormons which has peaked my curiosity.

I think we'll have to have the DVR working in overdrive.

LOL


I'll probably watch the PBS show and then watch 24 on the internet later.
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Re: The About-face Continues: DCP & Co. on "The Mor

Post by _Who Knows »

Some Schmo wrote:
Who Knows wrote: Jack Bauer vs. DCP. It's a tough one, but DCP wins out.


Dude... even if this is true, you shouldn't admit it in public. This is a contest between ultra-cool and donut-plump, and you're saying plump wins? Ouch!


Yeah, well, I figure 24 is available to watch online the next day.

edit - ^ what runtu said.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

Darn, wish I had someone to watch with. I'm sure it'll get Tivo'd because nobody else in the house will want to watch it with me live, let alone make a festive occasion of it. Just no love for exmo homies in Brooklyn, G.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Runtu wrote:
SatanWasSetUp wrote:
Fortigurn wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
RegularMormon wrote:Apparently the first segment is totally negative about polygamy and The
Mountain Meadows Massacre.


I ask you, how is it possible to be positive about either of those subjects, especially the MMM?


You underestimate the creativity of Mormon apologists.


Actually, I recall someone on FAIR/MAD speaking quite positively about the MMM. Can't remember what the point was, but I thought it was appalling.


Well, Runtu, is appears that DCP doesn't think too highly of you. Here is a post of his from the MADthread on September Dawn:

Daniel Peterson wrote:For what it's worth, my mendacious and malevolent stalker over at the Shades Obsession Board claims that at least somebody here feels positively about the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

I don't recall ever seeing anything here to that effect, but, of course, I could be mistaken. Unlikely as it is, my stalker could, for once, actually be telling the truth. I mean, it's not totally inconceivable . . .

Anyway, if such a massacre fan actually exists, I hope that he or she will come forward. Don't be shy! If you believe that the Mountain Meadows Massacre was a good thing, say so!


Unless I'm mistaken, the poster in question was Hammer. (Perhaps Kevin Graham can confirm this, or somebody with searching privileges at MAD.) I believe Hammer's remark was something to the effect that those slaughtered were "better off," since the survivors had to live with the pain of knowing that their family had been killed. Or something like that. The point is that I'm pretty sure it was Hammer.
Last edited by Physics Guy on Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

I think you're right. And if anyone does scare up the thread in question I would appreciate if they would post it. I forgot to save it.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

Yep, I remember something like that. I can't remember the details though.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

For those who are interested, DCP is now whining (yet again) that I am "misrepresenting" him. He is also engaging in the sort of namecalling that he routinely chastises RfM for. Anyways, I checked, and here is an old post of his in which he does appear to be gloating about how much the documentary would "stick it to the critics." Others can judge for themselves whether or not this is what he and his fan club were doing:

Daniel Peterson wrote:I've spent a lot of time with Helen Whitney on various occasions, including two lengthy interviews (maybe three), and have been in pretty constant contact with members of her staff over the past 2-3 years. I like her very, very much.

I think she'll be fair. There will, of course, be elements of the film that will make believing Latter-day Saints uncomfortable, but I'm quite confident, too, that there will be much about it that will irritate critics.
(emphasis added)

As to why I labeled this thread "The About-face Continues", here is a post from Bsix:

Bsix wrote:Remember. You heard it here first...and I said it.

The RfM crowd will hate this documentary. They will have fits.

Why? As a mainstream documentary, it will say objectively positive things about the Church and not be as harshly negative as they expect.

It will drive them crazy.


The folks at MAD have indeed performed an "about-face".
Post Reply