Have you ever had any experiences with manipulating Mormons

Post by **_Roger Morrison** » Thu May 17, 2007 12:41 am

wenglund wrote:I had anticipated that there would be some on this board that would fail to grasp the clear distinction between "High Machs" and people acting selflessly in the service of their God. However, I didn't expect it of you. How it is, though, that you would think I had pointed out anything even remotely resembling "High Machism of LDSism", is a mystery to me. But, life can be full of suprises.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Hi Wade, yes, "life can be full of surprises." The very state of my being when i read your link. "Where IS Wade now?" Glad to learn you haven't slipped 'back'. So, we're both surprised--win-win??

Do you really think there is a "...clear distinction between "High Machs" and people acting selflessly in the service of their God,"? Maybe "their God" is the operative term?? Could it be, You 'perceived' a "clear distinction..." that is not at all obvious to Others???

If you'll reread "Low Mach" definition i think there you'll find folks acting selflessly, confidently without hidden motives; vulernable as was THE man Jesus. As i understand things... Warm regards, Roger

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sat May 19, 2007 12:21 am

Oh, and coggins, did you say something? It was hard to hear above the insecure shrill.

[/quote]

At least a nice try might be expected here, don't you think?

Post by **_Some Schmo** » Mon May 21, 2007 1:28 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
Oh, and coggins, did you say something? It was hard to hear above the insecure shrill.

At least a nice try might be expected here, don't you think?

Alright. I'll be waiting.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:39 pm

Thanks for the admittance that your adolescent posturing was nothing more than precisely that.

Post by **_Mercury** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:40 pm

Coggins7 wrote:Thanks for the admittance that your adolescent posturing was nothing more than precisely that.

SS is just trying to get down to your level, that's all.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:51 pm

"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."

Absolutely astounding how well these words of wisdom apply to Atheism, is it not?

Post by **_Runtu** » Mon May 21, 2007 6:56 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."

Absolutely astounding how well these words of wisdom apply to Atheism, is it not?

Seems to me that it applies well to "that which one does not believe."

Post by **_Mercury** » Mon May 21, 2007 7:06 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."

Absolutely astounding how well these words of wisdom apply to Atheism, is it not?

Its astounding how little you understand what Sagan is saying.

The arrogant pompous nature with which you purport to view the world centers around your marginalized opinion. Your belief in Mormonism gives you a warm blanket that protects you from the fear pounded into you.

For you, both the disease and the cure is supplied by Mormonism. A racket is a racket is a racket.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Mon May 21, 2007 7:06 pm

Seems to me that it applies well to "that which one does not believe."

Well if its that subjective, of what value can it really be as a trusim? Its the application to which such a truth claim is put that matters, is it not?

Post by **_Mercury** » Mon May 21, 2007 7:17 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
Seems to me that it applies well to "that which one does not believe."

Well if its that subjective, of what value can it really be as a trusim? Its the application to which such a truth claim is put that matters, is it not?

Of course it does not apply to you. Your Mental Retardation has a habit of doing that.

And yes, you are retarded.