Runtu wrote:Yeah, ASURam was me in a fit of pettiness. Stupid and childish it was. Oh, well. I'm not perfect.
I'm not going to say anything about the mods or the folks over there other than to say that I'm clearly not welcome there. I wondered how long they would let me post unmolested, but I don't see any reason to post over there again.
While I have to admit that I can't quite grasp the reason ASUram came into being, you are still a nice guy. Besides, everyone suspected it was a put on anyway (which makes Skylla's need for an apology seem excessive and rather dominatrix-like).
Your comments as Huevo seemed good, so I would say you indeed have something to contribute to the MAD board if you choose.
ASURam was just stupid. When I was banned, I was told I was a substance-free cheerleader, so ASURam was a substance-free cheerleader. I know. Really stupid.
I don't know if I've burned too many bridges over there. Doesn't matter.
Runtu, I don't think you have burned too many bridges. They seem willing to let you stay in your latest incarnation, and I think perhaps you're thinking about this too much. If you want to post over there, I'd say just go for it, and don't concentrate so much on your perception of how welcome you are and so forth. If you're really, truly not welcome, they'll let you know by banning you.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
On the other hand, why bother? That place is downright creepy. Shades's perceptive Internet/Chapel distinction aside, I'm always shocked at the extremes there: on the one hand self-described "postmodern" intellectuals and on the other the most credulous literalists outside of a medieval village. And they all agree.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
Sethbag wrote:If you're really, truly not welcome, they'll let you know by banning you.
Yeah....I know I'm not welcome...but I keep inviting myself back.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Blixa wrote:Don't invite yourself to the "other place," Bond. Bad juju there.
Too late...I've been banned quite a few times already (and I plan to get banned quite a few more times in the future...I have to take the record from such as folks as harmony and Polygamy Porter ;).
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Bond...James Bond wrote:Too late...I've been banned quite a few times already (and I plan to get banned quite a few more times in the future...I have to take the record from such as folks as harmony and Polygamy Porter ;).
You'll have a long, long way to go before you catch up to "bat," a.k.a. "Captive Thinker." Not even he can remember all the sock-puppets he registered!
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"