God in school: Mine Okay, yours not okay

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

Hehe.. Yup, you'd be hard pressed to find any statement from any of them along the lines of "This will be a Christian nation".

It just seemed peculiar to me that if the vast majority of the founding fathers were Christian that the would have foresaw atheists, Mormons, etc. I doubt it was very PC to espouse or speak against religion in general in favor of atheism in those days. If some of the founding fathers were atheists, I doubt they were very open about it? Am I wrong on this point as well? That's my evidence on why they wouldn't have had this in mind. If you can show me differently than I'll concede you the point. If it's not worth it for you to research cause you don't know off the top of your head, honestly I guess it's not worth it to me either.

Thanks to The Ten Commandments concepts like Purgury and bearing False Accusation have become crimes in most societies over the centuries.


Are you saying this is a good thing or a bad thing? I think if you bear false witness and say someone did something to you and he/she goes to jail for it and it later is proven that you just lied to be vengeful or whatever, you should be liable for the same punishment. Yet in this day purgery and false witness seem to be taken very lightly and rarely punished, and if they are the sentences are much lighter than the possible harm they could have caused to him/her that he/she bore false witness against. I think bearing false witness against someone is a very bad thing to do, but for some reason a lot of people gloss over it and don't pay much attention to it.

Good grief, just using the masculine pronoun when the gender was unknown was so much easier. I would be willing to make it all she if we could just quit writing them both all the time.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

Hehe.. Yup, you'd be hard pressed to find any statement from any of them along the lines of "This will be a Christian nation".

It just seemed peculiar to me that if the vast majority of the founding fathers were Christian that the would have foresaw atheists, Mormons, etc. I doubt it was very PC to espouse or speak against religion in general in favor of atheism in those days. If some of the founding fathers were atheists, I doubt they were very open about it? Am I wrong on this point as well? That's my evidence on why they wouldn't have had this in mind. If you can show me differently than I'll concede you the point. If it's not worth it for you to research cause you don't know off the top of your head, honestly I guess it's not worth it to me either.

Thanks to The Ten Commandments concepts like Purgury and bearing False Accusation have become crimes in most societies over the centuries.


Are you saying this is a good thing or a bad thing? I think if you bear false witness and say someone did something to you and he/she goes to jail for it and it later is proven that you just lied to be vengeful or whatever, you should be liable for the same punishment. Yet in this day purgery and false witness seem to be taken very lightly and rarely punished, and if they are the sentences are much lighter than the possible harm they could have caused to him/her that he/she bore false witness against. I think bearing false witness against someone is a very bad thing to do, but for some reason a lot of people gloss over it and don't pay much attention to it.

Good grief, just using the masculine pronoun when the gender was unknown was so much easier. I would be willing to make it all she if we could just quit writing them both all the time.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_Mr. Coffee
_Emeritus
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:18 am

Post by _Mr. Coffee »

Ajax, did you eat a heaping bowl of stupid for dinner tonight? Inquiring minds want to know...


ajax18 wrote:It just seemed peculiar to me that if the vast majority of the founding fathers were Christian that the would have foresaw atheists, Mormons, etc. I doubt it was very PC to espouse or speak against religion in general in favor of atheism in those days. If some of the founding fathers were atheists, I doubt they were very open about it? Am I wrong on this point as well? That's my evidence on why they wouldn't have had this in mind.


Really? Which was why they revolted against England citing the estblishment of a state religion by England as one of the reason, right? Or why they put the Establishment CLause into the Bill of Rights?


ajax18 wrote: If you can show me differently than I'll concede you the point.


Very well. I will hold you to that then. Let's see what the founding fathers had to say...

ImageQuotes from John Adams.

“The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” President John Quincy Adams, Article 11, Treaty of Tripoli, 1787.

“Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, ‘this would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it.’” President Adams in a letter to Charles Cushing (October 19, 1756)

“Where do we find a precept in the Bible for Creeds, Confessions, Doctrines and Oaths, and whole carloads of trumpery that we find religion encumbered with in these days?”

“The Doctrine of the divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity.”

“...Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind.”


ImageHow about our Third President, Thomas Jefferson?

“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.” Jefferson’s interpretation of the first amendment in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association (January 1, 1802)

“I have examined all the known superstitions of the word, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half of the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth.”

“Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear....Do not be frightened from this inquiry by any fear of its consequences. If it end in a belief that there is no God, you will find incitements to virtue on the comfort and pleasantness you feel in its exercise and in the love of others which it will procure for you.”

“...that our civil rights have no dependence on religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics and geometry.”


ImageOr how about James Madison, Fourth President of our great nation?

“Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise....During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.”

“Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”


ImageTime to bust out with the Benjamin (Franklin), yo!

“My parents had given me betimes religious impressions, and I received from my infancy a pious education in the principles of Calvinism. But scarcely was I arrived at fifteen years of age, when, after having doubted in turn of different tenets, according as I found them combated in the different books that I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself.” Page 66 of Franklin's autobiography.


ImageHow about some Thomas Paine?

“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of....Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and of my own part, I disbelieve them all.” - Age of Reason

“All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.” - Age of Reason


ImageOr Ethan Allen.

“Denominated a Deist, the reality of which I have never disputed, being conscious that I am no Christian.”


ImageAnd then we have the words of our nation's first President, George Washington, from his farwell address.

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. "


Now, not only is there one confirmed Atheist there (Thomas Paine), but several declarations against religion that clearly show that the founding fathers of this nation wanted a clear divide between church and state.

Image

I will hold you to your word and accept your concession.
On Mathematics: I divided by zero! Oh SHI....
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

Mr. Coffee wrote:I will hold you to your word and accept your concession.


Ok I'll concede you the point. I was always taught that the U.S. government was based on Christian principles and a general religion. Just to be clear, you're telling me that's completely false, right?
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

"I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life."
- Thomas Paine
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Mr. Coffee
_Emeritus
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:18 am

Post by _Mr. Coffee »

ajax18 wrote:Ok I'll concede you the point.


Concession accepted. Thank you for having integrity.


ajax18 wrote:I was always taught that the U.S. government was based on Christian principles and a general religion. Just to be clear, you're telling me that's completely false, right?


In a way, yes. While quite a few of the founding fathers of the US were Christians of some sort, they were more deistic then orthodox. And yes, certain concepts in Christianity played a role in influencing they thoughts. Where you are wrong isn't in that the founding father weren't influenced by chistian thinking, it's in them not wanting religion as a part of their political ideology or government. They believed for the most part that a man's religion (or lack there of) was a personal matter between them and whatever deity they choose to pray to (or not pray to).




Jesery, damnit, your right. Just checked through my big database of quotes and found that one. Age of Reason, somewhere around page 66 If I recall correctly. Correction, Paine wasn't an atheist, he was a deist who had a lot of issues against Christianity.

Good catch. +10 cool points.
On Mathematics: I divided by zero! Oh SHI....
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

What elements of the gay rights or environmental agenda are you referring to? Hmmm... like equal access to health care? equal access to housing? information that might stop the rape of the planet?

Perhaps you could impact the public school environment directly by becoming a teacher?



The first two points are political issue fictions created by the homosexual rights lobby. Homosexuals are not discriminated against in any way whatever in these areas. There is no such thing as the "rape of the planet" and never has been.

Tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine. A shame, really.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

coffee
Jesery, damnit, your right. Just checked through my big database of quotes and found that one. Age of Reason, somewhere around page 66 If I recall correctly. Correction, Paine wasn't an atheist, he was a deist who had a lot of issues against Christianity.

Good catch. +10 cool points.


Just keepin' my eye on the ball. Don't blame me, I was taught to do it.

Jersey Girl
;-)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply