Mountain Meadows Massacre article whored on LDS.org

Post by **_Coggins7** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:46 pm

Bye gramps.

Post by **_gramps** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:57 pm

Coggins7 wrote:Bye gramps.

Bye-bye.

Post by **_harmony** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:03 pm

Coggins7 wrote:Yes, it was a low blow. Interesting though, what PP's reaction to this has been, especially from someone who throws low blows in virtually every post he's ever made. Its one low blow after another, against me, Wade, GBH, anybody he likes, whether they're here to defend themselves or not.

I think you mean "does not like", rather than "likes". Putting your whole thought into the same sentence is a skill that with a bit more practice you will likely have mastered.

When people bring this kind of thing upon themselves, regardless of its provenance, forgive me if my sympathy is
limited.

When did PP's wife start posting here? Attack PP if you must, but not his wife. She is not here to defend herself.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:44 am

I have never attacked his wife, and have no intention of doing so. I'm only pointing out that his being put out by such an attack is a very big steaming pot calling another kettle black.

Post by **_Polygamy Porter** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 2:22 am

Coggins7 wrote:I have never attacked his wife, and have no intention of doing so. I'm only pointing out that his being put out by such an attack is a very big steaming pot calling another kettle black.

At the end of this thread, both Paul and I have one thing in common.

We are both anti-mormons.

We both disagree with the "lord's scholars" at BYU.

Paul is railing against the studies that have been sanctioned by many of the so called "spiritual leaders" of LDS Inc.

He is nothing more than a heretic in their eyes and he hates it when people like me rub it in his face.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:09 pm

I'm afraid you misunderstood my point. You but a bigoted, ranting demagogue who's entire posting style has been, up to this point, based upon the use of personal attacks, slander, defamation, and calumny.

You have no basis upon which to be upset if anyone here personally attacks you or your wife. That's the point.

Post by **_moksha** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:13 pm

Polygamy Porter wrote:
Paul Osborne wrote:
article whored on

Porter,

The only whore you should be mentioning here is your wife. Without of doubt she is the only whore that would dare touch you without being paid.

And no, you can't have my pills. You poor sick man.

Paul O
I take no pills for made up mental issues like yours Paully.
Making such statement about my wife speaks volumes about you and how you feel about your wife, especially considering your unstable mind.
People who call good looking women whores are typically fat pathetic slobs and/or are married to a fat pathetic slob.

Just curious, may I inquire about your supposed mental problems that you think causes you to pop the Sandy candy?

It is always nice when participants can rise above the fray. Bond or Liz, is it possible to relegate personally insulting posts to the Telestial forum? by the way, most forums I have seen do not permit such insults.

Post by **_Polygamy Porter** » Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:00 am

Coggins7 wrote:I'm afraid you misunderstood my point. You but a bigoted, ranting demagogue who's entire posting style has been, up to this point, based upon the use of personal attacks, slander, defamation, and calumny.

You have no basis upon which to be upset if anyone here personally attacks you or your wife. That's the point.

Where did I say that I was upset? I can fully understand Paul going low like he has because my statements about his work being the laughing stock of BYU/FARMS must have cut to the bone. Perhaps it was mean of me to point out the obvious reality..

The only thing Paul has in common with the recognized professional LDS apologists is they are both wasting their time and talents.