Clothing

Post by **_asbestosman** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:40 am

harmony wrote:If there is no lust allowed, then what's the point?

To remember what lust was like--a sort of nostalgia if you will.

Edit: I mean what Nehor said.

Post by **_harmony** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:42 am

The Nehor wrote:
harmony wrote:If there is no lust allowed, then what's the point?

But there is lust allowed mixed with charity and pure romantic love. The best kind.

Then there will be no plural marriage. Because plural marriage and pure romantic love don't mix.

Post by **_asbestosman** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:48 am

harmony wrote:Then there will be no plural marriage. Because plural marriage and pure romantic love don't mix.

But if someone cloned my wife in such a way that I couldn't distinguish the original from the clone, would it be wrong to love both of them?

Post by **_The Nehor** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:50 am

harmony wrote:Then there will be no plural marriage. Because plural marriage and pure romantic love don't mix.

Why not?

Post by **_harmony** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:27 am

The Nehor wrote:
harmony wrote:Then there will be no plural marriage. Because plural marriage and pure romantic love don't mix.

Why not?

Because a man can't stock two shelves. He can't promise fidelity to one, if he has more than one. He can't concentrate and love one, if he has more than one. Romantic love can't survive if it's divided.

Post by **_The Nehor** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:30 am

harmony wrote:Because a man can't stock two shelves. He can't promise fidelity to one, if he has more than one. He can't concentrate and love one, if he has more than one. Romantic love can't survive if it's divided.

I've seen it work. In the eternities also remember you have infinite everything. Dividing an infinite number by any finite number still puts you at infinite.

Post by **_harmony** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:43 am

The Nehor wrote:
harmony wrote:Because a man can't stock two shelves. He can't promise fidelity to one, if he has more than one. He can't concentrate and love one, if he has more than one. Romantic love can't survive if it's divided.

I've seen it work.

If you didn't live it, you haven't seen it work. You may have observed it from the outside, but not from the inside, and certainly not from the women's point of view.

Post by **_Lucretia MacEvil** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:00 am

harmony wrote:I think the CK is going to be a pretty empty place. (No lust means no *ahem* blood infused erectile tissue, which of course means no penetration, which means no ejaculation, which means no fertilization... which means the whole idea of the CK just bites the dust). I think being dropkicked into the CK is the only way anyone will go.

But since celestial bodies have flesh and bone but no blood ... oh, where does the nonsense end?

Do Mormon women get to take their breast implants to heaven with them?

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:05 am

Forget what we'll be wearing in heaven, what are we wearing right now?! I decline to answer my own question. :P

KA

Post by **_Inconceivable** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:58 am

I'll go out on a limb here..

Since we'll all be perfect there, no-one will have to suffer by comparison.

So, probably not even a butt flap.