The Latest "FARMS Review" Fiasco

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Paul,

Take another pill dude, this is for fun.

While I don't believe in either side, I love to see you nipping at Dan's heels and every once in a while seeing him back kick you!

Great entertainment!
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: The Latest "FARMS Review" Fiasco

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:So "Ancient Research" didn't cover Maya murals, the DSS, classic Islamic texts, Syriac manuscripts or Petra and Herculaneum? Seems like that would indeed cover it all.

It certainly could, of course, depending on how you take the and.

But some assumed that everything we did in terms of ancient research also had to have a Mormon-studies angle. And that simply wasn't true.

harmony wrote:He couldn't object? Do you think he would have, had he been in a position to?

He might have objected. I can't say. But his family was deeply honored by the name-change, and that has pleased me a great deal.
_Paul Osborne

Post by _Paul Osborne »

Polygamy Porter wrote:Paul,

Take another pill dude, this is for fun.

While I don't believe in either side, I love to see you nipping at Dan's heels and every once in a while seeing him back kick you!

Great entertainment!


Well, he needs his heels nipped. I'm not afraid of his kicking or his academic ability. Let him try if he will. I have nothing against him personally other than I don't like him. Go figure. But I'm commanded to love everyone and that is really challenging. Frankly, I hope he doesn't strike up a conversation with me because I don't want to talk to him. And I'm damn sure he doesn't want to talk to me either.

So there. Go eat another one of your hairy donuts, Porter.

Paul O
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Paul Osborne wrote:I say, "Yes to the KEP and no to FARMS"!

I say, "Yes to Joseph Smith and no to Hugh Nibley".

I say, "Yes to Oliver Cowdery and no to John Gee".


Paul O, you're the greatest! Believe me when I tell you that Mormonism on the Internet wouldn't be the same without you--not by a long shot.

I have nothing against him personally other than I don't like him.


??? Dude, you crack me up!

Go eat another one of your hairy donuts, Porter.


Oh, I'm sure we could all go for eating some hairy donuts right about now. . .
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Paul Osborne wrote:[...]
I have nothing against him personally other than I don't like him.
[...]


I want this on a T-shirt.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Paul Osborne wrote:I say, "Yes to the KEP and no to FARMS"!

I say, "Yes to Joseph Smith and no to Hugh Nibley".

I say, "Yes to Oliver Cowdery and no to John Gee".


Paul O, you're the greatest!


Yes, Paul O is the greatest, lol! I love Paul O! He's a hoot.

KA
_DonBradley
_Emeritus
Posts: 1118
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:58 am

Post by _DonBradley »

WOW.

I'm impressed with the line-up in this latest FARMS Review. I particularly like that there is a "scholarly exchange" section! Bravo for opening the journal to this type of dialogue.

Don
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Dr. Shades wrote:
John Gee, "A Method for Studying the Facsimiles".....347 (review of Allen J. Fletcher, A Study Guide to the Facsimiles of the Book of Abraham)


Does his study guide match that provided by Joseph Smith?


Joseph didn't know what he was doing. The apologists DO know what he was doing.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
Post Reply