The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
Make it worth my while. If I find any lies on your website, why doncha take the whole site down? Are you that sure of your website?
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
Shades, I thought I'd read about a sisterwife on your website. Wife no 19? Or something of the sort. I can't seem to find it. Was that not on your website?
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
Make it worth my while. If I find any lies on your website, why doncha take the whole site down? Are you that sure of your website?
wow, you are a freaking coward who can't back up a statement.
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
Make it worth my while. If I find any lies on your website, why doncha take the whole site down? Are you that sure of your website?
wow, you are a freaking coward who can't back up a statement.
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
Make it worth my while. If I find any lies on your website, why doncha take the whole site down? Are you that sure of your website?
Why not just help rid the world of at least one anti-Mormon lie. Shades has promised to take it off-line. Seems like a good work to be involved in to me.
The Nehor wrote:Thanks for a hearty belly laugh. I've never seen any of your Pro-Truth literature that didn't contain at least one lie, a verifiable one even.
Amen to this... Never have seen ANY "pro-truth" literature that didn't have at least one verifiable lie in it, or half truth.
In that case, I have challenge for the two of you. Please go to my other website, MormonInformation.com and show me a verifiable lie in it, or half truth. If you can find one, I'll drop it from my site and thank you for your assistance.
When I get a chance, I'll look through it. Are you Anti-Mormon/Pro-Truth?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Okay, well, the page itself doesn't fall under "anti-mormon" literature to me because most of the information is sepeculative, and what is not speculative does not effect my testimony because I don't base my testimony upon the things it talks about...
For instance, I could care less how anti-mormon is defined. Your exit story doesn't effect my testimony either (its definitely not anti-mormon information). Chiasmus has no bearing upon my belief in the Book of Mormon. I know that the church does not have 12 million ACTIVE members (no church can accurately count their membership). As for the Kinderhook plates, I have but one question: if they were translated as such, why didn't they get put into scripture? Most everything else Joseph Smith translated was put into the scriptures, but the Kinderhook plates never were. This leads to speculation, of course, but its a definite question that needs to be answered. Could it be that the quote from Joseph Smith there was one of those "speaking as a man" vs "speaking as a prophet" ideas?
I have to go to bed here in a few, and so I will read over the rest of these later, but on first look, Dr. Shades. your site is NOT an anti site. It is information, most of which bear no weight upon my testimony. My definition of an anti site is a site which is dedicated in trashing and pulling away members of the Church who are lukewarm in their testimony to begin with. Your site is just information, not one way or the other. Maybe I will find different tomorrow, as for now, its just an information site.
by the way, this thread was supposed to be about check fraud, not the church.
Nephi wrote:Make it worth my while. If I find any lies on your website, why doncha take the whole site down? Are you that sure of your website?
wow, you are a freaking coward who can't back up a statement.
Name calling. Hi Merc. Good to see you tonight.
If the shoe fits...
Coward: One who has no word, usually seen in the act of not being able to back up what they claim. Also see False Bravado and a burnout Mormon convert. Its OK nephi, some s*** wll go down some day, youll get disillusioned and run off to join the next Heavens Gate.
Give it time...give it time.
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning
Nephi wrote:Okay, well, the page itself doesn't fall under "anti-mormon" literature to me because most of the information is sepeculative, and what is not speculative does not effect my testimony because I don't base my testimony upon the things it talks about...
For instance, I could care less how anti-mormon is defined. Your exit story doesn't effect my testimony either (its definitely not anti-mormon information). Chiasmus has no bearing upon my belief in the Book of Mormon. I know that the church does not have 12 million ACTIVE members (no church can accurately count their membership). As for the Kinderhook plates, I have but one question: if they were translated as such, why didn't they get put into scripture? Most everything else Joseph Smith translated was put into the scriptures, but the Kinderhook plates never were. This leads to speculation, of course, but its a definite question that needs to be answered. Could it be that the quote from Joseph Smith there was one of those "speaking as a man" vs "speaking as a prophet" ideas?
I have to go to bed here in a few, and so I will read over the rest of these later, but on first look, Dr. Shades. your site is NOT an anti site. It is information, most of which bear no weight upon my testimony. My definition of an anti site is a site which is dedicated in trashing and pulling away members of the Church who are lukewarm in their testimony to begin with. Your site is just information, not one way or the other. Maybe I will find different tomorrow, as for now, its just an information site.
by the way, this thread was supposed to be about check fraud, not the church.
I have never seeen such a salad toss of a collection of mopologetic nonsense.
Run away Run away!!
And crawling on the planet's face Some insects called the human race Lost in time And lost in space...and meaning