Trevor wrote:I also ask, what is it that I have written that is so skewed that I should qualify as a 'bigot with an axe to grind'? Is that how you generally characterize people who disagree with you?
Yes, generally, that is how Cogs characterizes people who disagree with him. You're either a bigot or some sort of quasi-communist, leftist, New Age, NAMBLA-supporting, acid-dropping hippie.
Runtu wrote:Yes, generally, that is how Cogs characterizes people who disagree with him. You're either a bigot or some sort of quasi-communist, leftist, New Age, NAMBLA-supporting, acid-dropping hippie.
Someone here has acid and they didn't tell me? BASTARDS!
Trevor wrote:I also ask, what is it that I have written that is so skewed that I should qualify as a 'bigot with an axe to grind'? Is that how you generally characterize people who disagree with you?
Yes, generally, that is how Cogs characterizes people who disagree with him. You're either a bigot or some sort of quasi-communist, leftist, New Age, NAMBLA-supporting, acid-dropping hippie.
Or you could be female. Then you're so far beneath his contempt, he has to scrape you off his shoe after he kicks you.
That is not true. We don't accept the Bible. We accept the Bible conditionally. And just because something was practiced doesn't mean God approved. Slavery was practiced too; so was discrimination, racism, sexism. All that says is that the men who wrote the Bible had an agenda. That doesn't make it God's agenda.
Joseph screwed up. It's about time our leaders admitted it.
Its also perhaps time that Harmony admitted her abyssal lack of knowledge regarding most things LDS, most things biblical, and most things political. All of course, that's then left, is her little black bag of hatreds, fixations, wish fantasies, and sanctimonuous finger wagging at that of which she understands little.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Coggins7 wrote: Its also perhaps time that Harmony admitted her abyssal lack of knowledge regarding most things LDS, most things biblical, and most things political. All of course, that's then left, is her little black bag of hatreds, fixations, wish fantasies, and sanctimonuous finger wagging at that of which she understands little.
Hey, Cogs, did you ever respond to my posting of the First Presidency Statement? You said that there was never any official statement that the ban was doctrinal, whereas the First Presidency said specifically that it was doctrinal. Just curious as to what you think.
Yes, generally, that is how Cogs characterizes people who disagree with him. You're either a bigot or some sort of quasi-communist, leftist, New Age, NAMBLA-supporting, acid-dropping hippie.
Have you spoken to your Bishop about these personal life issues Runtu? He's there to help...
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Yes, generally, that is how Cogs characterizes people who disagree with him. You're either a bigot or some sort of quasi-communist, leftist, New Age, NAMBLA-supporting, acid-dropping hippie.
Have you spoken to your Bishop about these personal life issues Runtu? He's there to help...
Heh. You know what's funny, Cogs? At this point, the only things that would keep me from getting a temple recommend would be my lack of a testimony and nonpayment of tithes. I haven't even been drinking coffee lately. Oh, wait. I did have a sip of KA's Long Island Iced Tea. It's strange how my life is pretty much the same since I left the church, except I have a little more income to work with.
Thanks Cog for the lesson. I know I'm slow but I just figured out what a strawman was - most of everything you post is ignoring the evidence people provide to you, or you just attack the person personally which is another issue.