21 Unconvincing Arguments for God

[_keene]

Mav:

THANK YOU for finally posting! What a great start it was.

You're going to have to go poke him with a stick every time you want him to post. His particular version of ADD keeps him distracted from distractions such as this.

[_JAK]

The fact that atheist exist is proof that there is a God.
How do rational, evidence only people hate something that does not exist?
If they redicule faith and faith is false then they are preoccupied resisting nothing and since these are rational and evidence only people faith must be real therefore God is real, for faith cannot be real unless the object of that faith is real.
So the fact that atheist exist is proof that there is a God.

Such is a good enough reason for any atheist. The mind of an enemy constricts its perseptions to view a distortion of the object of its enmity and since all atheist fight against God and take an enemy stance then all their rationale is suspect of distortion and the capricious logic of an irrational vilification.

James Muir Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:18 pm

The fact that atheist exist is proof that there is a God.
How do rational, evidence only people hate something that does not exist?

If they redicule faith and faith is false then they are preoccupied resisting nothing and since these are rational and evidence only people faith must be real therefore God is real, for faith cannot be real unless the object of that faith is real.

So the fact that atheist exist is proof that there is a God.

Such is a good enough reason for any atheist. The mind of an enemy constricts its perseptions (perceptions) to view a distortion of the object of its enmity and since all atheist fight against God and take an enemy stance then all their rationale is suspect of distortion and the capricious logic of an irrational vilification.

First statement is absurd. There is not the slightest “proof” for God based on the biases of the wide variety of claims.

Second, there is no hatred involved for those who do not subscribe to some form of theism. Atheists are simply those who do not subscribe to any form of theism. That does not equal hatred as you claim.

Third, it’s not a matter of “ridicule” as you claim. It’s a matter of rational and logical conclusion based on evidence. No evidence for gods in ancient times and no evidence for God in present times has been established. Hence, the rejection of any and all the various claims for gods or for God is based on absence of evidence for the various claims made.

“Capricious logic” is bogus on the part of those who invent, yes invent God claims. NO evidence for God has been established -- not in the Generalization nor in the Specifics which various pundits of God articulate.

Your criticism is without any evidence for your claims, James Muir. Extraordinary claims absent evidence should be disregarded. Your claims should be disregarded.

JAK