Jason Bourne wrote:They were cynical? How do you know this? Or could it be this is just your own judgment call that could not at all be well, cynical.
You may choose to believe that two conservative Republicans would honestly approve of the federal government's interference in people's religion. I say this kind of inconsistency calls for inquiry into their motive. I provided you with the most obvious motivation for doing so. I don't think it takes cynicism to call this for what it is.
Jason Bourne wrote:I am blind because I conclude differently then you. I see.
It seems to me that you are obstinate, and that in your obstinacy you choose to play blind. Very punny, by the way.
Jason Bourne wrote:I am sorry. I recall one. Can you enlighten me on the other?
I'll let you do your own work on that. Go back and think carefully about our exchange. Hold your hand in front of you and every time you see me point to what I accept as evidence, extend a finger. Count the total number of fingers when you reach the last piece of evidence.
Jason Bourne wrote:By the way, as an aside, every President for many years have had Billy Graham in to Chat and consult with them, Do you think if Romney were President and he invited Gordon Hinckley to the white house for a fireside chat that would be acceptable?
Oh, so you see the two as comparable. That's interesting. I do not. I think it would be singularly unwise for Romney to invite Hinckley down to Washington to confer with him. I hope he never has the opportunity to do so.
You see, I don't recall the last time Billy Graham claimed to have unique authority to act as the oracle of God for all humankind. Nor do I recall a president that made a covenant in an exclusive temple to dedicate his entire life to a Kingdom of God for which Billy Graham is the earthly representative. I don't recall Billy Graham acting as the supreme governing authority of a Church whose history includes being a theocratic kingdom outside of the reach of the United States.
There is a reason why people are uncomfortable with these things, and it is not gratuitous. Mormons may believe their own persecution complex, but distrust of Mormon governance comes from decades of history in which Mormon leaders sought to lead lives essentially separate from American authority, and to exercise supreme power over members of their Church in conflict with the laws of the land.
You may believe that everything is OK today, and that Americans have no reason to be wary of a Mormon president. The real question is this: has the LDS Church done enough to convince others that there is nothing to fear? I don't think they have, and until they do, I don't think they will secure the trust of the nation. Personally, I think there are enough red flags to disqualify (implicitly) Romney from the presidency.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”