Sethbag wrote:
Like I said, we need a practical and pragmatic solution.
Is it the United States' responsibility to educate the citizens of a foreign country? No, I'll grant that. But guess what? These citizens of a foreign country happen to be living in America, and they're probably going to stay for a while. We're going to have to deal with them one way or another.
Are you against some version of mass deportation as a solution?
Sethbag wrote:We can educate the children and hope they have some way of "going legal" when they grow up and make a better life for themselves and their own future children,
At our and our future children's expense.
Sethbag wrote: or we can pay $30k a year to house them in prison when they turn to the only option we've left open for them, which is a life of crime. Which would you prefer?
Whichever is more cost effective. I would be curious to see the numbers. Ideally, I would like to see illegal immigrants deported and educated in their home country, although that may not be an option. If it is more cost effective to educate illegal immigrant children, well I guess that would be what I prefer. I still wouldn't feel good about it, again, because of the American children that get short-changed as a result of it.
Sethbag wrote:Seriously, if some small children are taken to this country by their illegal immigrant parents and grow up in America and get through their adolescence and teenage years with no formal education, exactly what do you imagine will become of them?
Well, in a country where anybody can become anything, who knows. Who is to say they will become anything with a formal education.
Sethbag wrote: Would you rather have them running around still not speaking English and being utterly ignorant and illiterate, with almost no possibility of a decent life, or would you rather have them speaking good English and being smart and educated and prepared to contribute somehow to the society they live amongst?
The term "anchor baby" comes to mind here. I realize the difficulty of the situation, but I think it's a slippery slope and again, gives just another incentive to break the law.
Sethbag wrote:Again, I don't support illegal immigration. But they're here, there always will be some level of illegal immigration here, and the situation presents us with a bunch of practical, real-life problems and choices. I'm for the more humane and pragmatic choices, and against the more dogmatic and inhumane ones.
Me too. I think we may just not see eye to eye on this.