Posts split from Dangers of Religion Reloaded

_marg · Post by **_marg** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:06 am

Bond...James Bond wrote:Mod note: Split by Bond

I just made a post in that thread after your split.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:07 am

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:Mod note: Split by Bond

You need to move over my last response on the thread. It is a response to the JAK post above.

s***...sorry bout that.

Bond,

You're not supposed to say crap as a moderator. It makes us look like hypocrites.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:09 am

Moniker wrote:I think other things makes a mod look like a hypocrite. :)

Like what, Moniker? By all means, let's hear it.

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:10 am

Jersey Girl wrote:JAK

JAK wrote:Thus, when someone moves a post or a series of posts or starts a new subject re-titling it in a way which was never titled by one who made the first appearing post, there is confusion.

Posting in post mortem mode now. Just for the record, as thread starter I'm fine with what is taking place on this thread that I started. As a new moderator, I can tell you that the confusion is by no means only on the part of the reader. What has taken place here is a moderating nightmare to the point where I've lost interest in the thread that I myself started here.

I want to point out that I did create a "companion" thread for this one in the Celestial Forum. Had the thread continued up there, there might not have been a need to cannibalize any of these exchanges from this one.

I can't say that I'm sorry for the confusion or disagreement that you and others may have regarding how moderators have responded to these threads.

Jersey Girl

marg wrote:
JAK wrote:Originally, “Discussion about JAK’s methods” was not placed there by you, marg. Yet on “The Off-Topic Forum” where it now stands, it appears as if you originated the thread. You did not. But that’s the appearance.

I agree JAK, and I've changed the subject title which I just realized today I could do and I should have done previously.

Post by **_skippy the dead** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:29 am

Oh good heavens - can we set up a cage match amongst all the cranky parties and be done with this? I think this whole area of discussion has been hashed to death.

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:33 am

skippy the dead wrote:Oh good heavens - can we set up a cage match amongst all the cranky parties and be done with this? I think this whole area of discussion has been hashed to death.

Personally I'm ready for Judgement Day just to get away from all the yapping.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:21 pm

Thanks for splitting this, Bond. I was busy wrestling a 4 year old to bed last night, and couldn't do it.

;)

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:45 pm

liz3564 wrote:Thanks for splitting this, Bond. I was busy wrestling a 4 year old to bed last night, and couldn't do it.

;)

I know you like men a little young....but come on Liz.... :P

Post by **_Moniker** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:08 pm

Why wasn't it put in off-topic? My comments were split from the thread (when they dealt with the previous thread) and put in off-topic...

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:18 pm

Bond...James Bond wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Thanks for splitting this, Bond. I was busy wrestling a 4 year old to bed last night, and couldn't do it.

;)

I know you like men a little young....but come on Liz.... :P

:P

Sorry..should have added that it was my SON!

LOL