Oh, I see the connection now...
I'd say you're blind.
Oh, I see the connection now...
bcspace wrote:
However, I note that Obama is indeed really a friend to terrorists, both at home and abroad, and surrounds himself with their supporters. This is much more important than his name.
dartagnan wrote:EA, why don't you drop the drama and deal with the facts?
Does anyone really deny that terrorists would prefer a President Obama over a President McCain?
Think.
2) It would be to the advantage of Islamic terrorists like Al-Qaeda to have a president with a bellicose policy towards the Islamic world to be elected, as that is what feeds recruitment, increases the odds of a broader world war they seek, and costs the US in terms of lives and money. There's a moderate chance Bin Laden might try to imply an endorsement of Obama like he did Kerry in the waning days of the 2004 election to swing votes in the opposite direction because of this. But that only affected the election by a couple of points, which wouldn't be nearly enough in this case.
dartagnan wrote:EA, why don't you drop the drama and deal with the facts?
Does anyone really deny that terrorists would prefer a President Obama over a President McCain?
Think.
1) This is a different assertion than stating Obama is a friend of terrorists home and abroad and has surrounded himself with their supporters.
That is a very nasty, dangerous assertion that is offensively false.
I'm serious. If an attempt is made on Obama's life by some would be hero, it is those who fanned these flames that will be in part responsible.
McCain rallies are getting increasingly ugly because of nutballs like those found on this board and even McCain seems to be trying to pull this back a bit now.
It would be to the advantage of Islamic terrorists like Al-Qaeda to have a president with a bellicose policy towards the Islamic world to be elected, as that is what feeds recruitment, increases the odds of a broader world war they seek, and costs the US in terms of lives and money. There's a moderate chance Bin Laden might try to imply an endorsement of Obama like he did Kerry in the waning days of the 2004 election to swing votes in the opposite direction because of this. But that only affected the election by a couple of points, which wouldn't be nearly enough in this case.
No kidding. Bush played into Bin Laden's hand in every way imaginable. He handed him a great recruitment tool in Iraq, as well.
dartagnan wrote: Does anyone really deny that terrorists would prefer a President Obama over a President McCain?
Terrorists want the world to hate us. They want a war.
By the way, the attempt to put Obama on the side of the terroists has created much bigotry and hate inlcuding shouts to kill Obama etc.
I will never even dream of voting for a party that attracts the anti-intellectual, Bible fundamentist xenophobe haters that I have seen lately. Even McCain has become embarrassed by this.
Recently I suggested this on another site and the responses included things like "f*** n88ers"
I've really really had it with these people.
I am surrounded by their angry toothless faces
and have heard hints at wishes that Obama get shot. People are making me sick.
Obama is a good man and intelligent. I also think McCain has many virtues and is not a nut. But, his party attracts the worst in this country.
Like I said I've had it with these people. McCain needs a new party. I will vote for Obama.