Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_richardMdBorn
_Emeritus
Posts: 1639
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:05 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _richardMdBorn »

GoodK wrote:
Calculus Crusader wrote:
Sorry, Bub, but atheists Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot killed more people than any Christian prince, pope, or potentate. (The first two alone killed 60,000,000 between them.)

Either a flagrant untruth or you're ignorant.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, this time.
Which statement is untrue, the 60M or that it was more than any any Christian prince, etc? If the 60M is untrue, please give a source for this. If you think a Christian prince, pope, or potentate killed more than 60M, please give us the name and the evidence. R. J. Rummel thinks Mao killed 77M.
WND Exclusive MUCH ABOUT HISTORY
Mao more lethal
than Hitler, Stalin
Expert says Chinese leader's policies
led to death of 77 million countrymen

Posted: November 29, 2005
1:00 am Eastern

By Jon Dougherty
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com

A noted expert in calculating the number of deaths caused by authoritarian regimes says the late Chinese communist leader Mao Tse-tung's policies and actions led to the deaths of nearly 77 million of his countrymen, surpassing those killed by Nazi Party founder Adolf Hitler and Soviet Premier Josef Stalin.

R. J. Rummel, professor emeritus of political science and a Nobel Peace Prize finalist who has published dozens of books chronicling so-called "democide," or death by government, said the new Chinese figure – nearly double his previous estimate of about 38 million – was based on what he believes was Mao's duplicity in China's great famine of 1958 to 1961.

"From the time I wrote my book 'China's Bloody Century,' I have held to these democide totals for Mao: Civil War-Sino-Japanese War 1923-1949 = 3,466,000 murdered; and Rule over China (People's Republic of China) 1949-1987 = 35,236,000 murdered," Rummel wrote in an e-mail to WND.

He said he didn't previously add in the famine totals because he was not convinced those deaths were caused by Mao purposely. Instead, he said he believed:

* The famine was due to the "Great Leap Forward," when Mao tried to catch up with the West in producing iron and steel;

* The factorization of agriculture, forcing virtually all peasants to give up their land, livestock, tools and homes to live in regimented communes;

* The exuberant over-reporting of agricultural production by commune and district managers for fear of the consequences of not meeting their quotas;

* The consequent belief of high communist officials that excess food was being produced and could be exported without starving the peasants (though "reports from traveling high officials indicated that peasants might be starving in certain localities");

* An investigative team was sent out from Beijing and reported back that there was mass starvation, after which the government then "stopped exporting food and began to import what was needed to stop the famine."

"Thus, I believed that Mao's policies were responsible for the famine, but he was misled about it, and finally when he found out, he stopped it and changed his policies," Rummel said. "Therefore, I argued, this was not a democide."

But after further review of available data, he said he agreed with other researchers who had counted the famine figures as part of the regime's mass murder figures.

"They were right and I was wrong," he said.

Rummel said he was influenced to revise his figures upward after reading a pair of books, "Wild Swans: Two Daughters of China," by Jung Chang; and "Mao: the Unknown Story," which Jung wrote with her husband, Jon Halliday.

"From the biography of Mao, which I trust … I can now say that yes, Mao's policies caused the famine. He knew about it from the beginning," Rummel said, adding Mao even "tried to take more food from the people to pay for his lust for international power, but was overruled by a meeting of 7,000 top Communist Party members."

"So, the famine was intentional. What was its human cost? I had estimated that 27 million Chinese starved to death or died from associated diseases. Others estimated the toll to be as high as 40 million. Chang and Halliday put it at 38 million and, given their sources, I will accept that," said Rummel. "I'm now convinced that Stalin exceeded Hitler in monstrous evil, and Mao beat out Stalin."

Mao's butchery "exceeds the 61,911,000 murdered by the Soviet Union 1917-1987, with Hitler far behind at 20,946,000 wiped out (from) 1933-1945," he said.

The Chinese communist leader's toll is higher than the 34.1 million combat deaths in "all wars between 1900 and 1987," including World Wars I and II, Vietnam, Korea, and the Mexican and Russian Revolutions.

"Mao alone murdered over twice as many as were killed in combat in all these wars," he said.

In all, Rummel estimates about 174 million people were killed during incidents of democide in the 20th century, "of which communist regimes murdered about 148 million," he said, adding, "Communists overall have murdered four times those killed in combat."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47616

I know it's worldnut, but you can also look up Rummel's books.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Calculus Crusader wrote:Sorry, Bub, but atheists Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot killed more people than any Christian prince, pope, or potentate. (The first two alone killed 60,000,000 between them.)


Yes, but they killed people in the name of Communism, not Atheism.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_richardMdBorn
_Emeritus
Posts: 1639
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:05 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _richardMdBorn »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Calculus Crusader wrote:Sorry, Bub, but atheists Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot killed more people than any Christian prince, pope, or potentate. (The first two alone killed 60,000,000 between them.)


Yes, but they killed people in the name of Communism, not Atheism.
Communism was an atheistic movement. Theoretically, all communists were atheists; obviously, not all atheists are communists.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Dr. Shades »

richardMdBorn wrote:Communism was an atheistic movement.

I'm going to have to CFR on that one. I've seen nothing to convince me that the one had anything to do with the other.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_richardMdBorn
_Emeritus
Posts: 1639
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:05 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _richardMdBorn »

Dr. Shades wrote:
richardMdBorn wrote:Communism was an atheistic movement.

I'm going to have to CFR on that one. I've seen nothing to convince me that the one had anything to do with the other.
You have got to be kidding. I'm astonished that you need a reference for this. Wikipedia is not always reliable, but it is here:
The 20th century also saw the political advancement of atheism, spurred on by interpretation of the works of Marx and Engels. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, increased religious freedom for minority religions lasted for a few years, before the policies of Stalinism turned towards repression of religion. The Soviet Union and other communist states promoted state atheism and opposed religion, often by violent means.[91]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

Dr. Shades wrote:
richardMdBorn wrote:Communism was an atheistic movement.

I'm going to have to CFR on that one. I've seen nothing to convince me that the one had anything to do with the other.


I have no idea what "CFR" means, but here is a citation:

European Jungle By F. Yeats-Brown
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

And, of course, Marx, the Father of Communism, was a devout atheist:

Karl Marx By Allen W. Wood
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_Calculus Crusader
_Emeritus
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:52 am

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _Calculus Crusader »

GoodK wrote:
Calculus Crusader wrote:
Sorry, Bub, but atheists Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot killed more people than any Christian prince, pope, or potentate. (The first two alone killed 60,000,000 between them.)



Either a flagrant untruth or you're ignorant.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, this time.


I apologize for the intrusion of reality into your atheistic bubble, but atheistic dictators hold the record for killing people.
Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei

(I lost access to my Milesius account, so I had to retrieve this one from the mothballs.)
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Commentary on Richard and GoodK's Debate

Post by _moksha »

Calculus Crusader wrote:And, of course, Marx, the Father of Communism, was a devout atheist:

Karl Marx By Allen W. Wood


Well, that is one form of communism based on following Marx nonreligious outlook. But that does not preclude communism with a religious focus. Just look at a variation of this theme in the Utopian movements of the 19th Century or the 20th Century commune versions in this country. Close to home we have the LDS United Order (even though LDS apologists have their denials of it being communism in triplicate, it was indeed a form of religious communism)*.







*Q - How can you say this Moksha?
A - Hey, I am not burdened with the responsibility of whitewashing it so as to fit in with John Birch ideology.

.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply