Adam-God Theory

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _Trevor »

bcspace wrote:Which tells me that you did not read it at all is this is not Watson's claim.


But he certainly discussed it:

There are a few other problems among the Brigham Young materials, but they all relate to an inaccurate reporting or transmission of the text.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _bcspace »

Jason has read extensively on Adam God.


As have I.

Jason used to argue the nonsensical idea that BC argues-BY did not really teach this, look at what else he had to say, was he talking about Adam Sr of Adam Jr.


Jason does not consider other quotes by BY in which an Adam-God theory is impossible to contemplate if BY taught the same doctrine consistently. Adam Sr. and Adam Jr. is the only plausible explaination so far.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Danna

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _Danna »

bcspace wrote:
Jason has read extensively on Adam God.


As have I.

Jason used to argue the nonsensical idea that BC argues-BY did not really teach this, look at what else he had to say, was he talking about Adam Sr of Adam Jr.


Jason does not consider other quotes by BY in which an Adam-God theory is impossible to contemplate if BY taught the same doctrine consistently. Adam Sr. and Adam Jr. is the only plausible explaination so far.


So which specific quotes from BY can only be explained by Adam Jr and Adam Snr.

You seem to be hinting that BY had a deeper doctrine in mind, please show us the specific statements from BY that support this.

I have seen the Watson paper and it contains post hoc speculation attempting to reconcile BY and the doctrine of eternal progression. But nothing that indicates that BY actually had two different beings in mind.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _bcspace »

I have seen the Watson paper and it contains post hoc speculation attempting to reconcile BY and the doctrine of eternal progression. But nothing that indicates that BY actually had two different beings in mind.


I disagree. For example....

Mother Eve was the daughter of Adam." [WWJ 7:152, Aug 31, 1873]


Adam who? Sr. or Jr.? Did BY teach that Adam married his daughter?

In addition, here is what Watson himself says in his paper...

If you believe that BY believes LDS doctrine and scripture, Adam cannot possibly be God the Father because God is a resurrected being who cannot die again and Adam dies.

And you can go down the list of doctrines that BY knew that preclude any type of Adam - God theory....

Adam is not God
Adam is subordinate to Jesus Christ
Adam is a son of God

etc. etc.

Another example. Journal of Discourses 1:50-51. Wilford Woodruff recorded it long hand it is it different. For example WW reports it as the Father comming into the garden with one of his wives until he was able to beget a tabernalce of (Adam). He also distinguishes between God and Adam (Jr) is a god, lowercase g.

B.E. Rich also reports from the same sermon..."Jesus, our elder brother was begotten in the flesh by the same character, who talked with Adam in the Garden of Eden, and who is our Father in Heaven". Another clear distinction.

It is evidences like these that make me quite certain that both you and Jason glossed over the Watson argument without really studying it or taking it's objections to Adam God into account.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _RockSlider »

Mad Viking wrote:Adam = Our God
Jehovah = Adam's God
Elohim = Jehovah's God


Adam = our god
Jehovah = his son
Elohim = Grand dad
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _RockSlider »

bcspace wrote:
Can anyone articulate the "Adam-God" theory that is attributed to Brigham Young?


Yes. But "attributed" is the operative word.

BY never taught such a thing. His opinion actually was that God the Father and Mother came to earth and by partaking of the physical fruits, conceived the Adam and Eve who fell. Thus God the Father and Mother became a type of Adam and Eve to Adam and Eve.


You need to find a copy of the "Lecture at the Veil" Written, with the first time the endowment was put to pen ... in St. George temple
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _RockSlider »

Alter Idem wrote:
Kolohe wrote:Can anyone articulate the "Adam-God" theory that is attributed to Brigham Young?


Thanks to Cinepro's link, I can. Thank-you, thank-you Cinepro!!!!

I wrote on this topic on my blog at MADB.

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... blogid=18&

From my article;
In a nutshell, this is what the Adam-God theory which Brigham Young taught comprised;

Adam was a resurrected, immortal being, someone who had lived on an earth like ours, had received his exaltation and become one of "the gods". In the celestial world he and his wives begat spirit children (that's us) and so he is the father of all the spirits who inhabit this earth. He and his wife Eve came to earth and together they ate the fruits and veges of the earth, which had the effect on their bodies as to allow them to bear mortal children. They became as little children, forgetting all and "fell" that the plan could carry on. Later they died, but "did not lay their bodies down in the dust" but went back to the spirit world.

Jesus Christ is Adam's oldest spirit son, his heir; He was the firstborn of his spirit children in the Celestial world. Hence it was Adam who came to the virgin Mary and is the literal father of Jesus.

Pres.Young did not explain what relationship there was between Eloheim, Jesus Christ and Adam--but he did suggest that Eloheim is the Grandfather of Adam. (see page 18-19) Brigham Young saw Eloheim as a separate being from Adam and claimed that Adam had contact with his "grandfather" and "great-grandfathers"...these would be more of "the Gods" mentioned in scripture. So, Adam does not equal Eloheim--at least not the Eloheim who cursed Cain..that was the "grandfather" Adam.

Yes to all of the above

"Adam" is also a title--he used it as a title when explaining at times and this can add to the confusion.

Exactly, just like God, Christ, ... Bishop are titles, different individuals fill the roles ... its been suggested that the Holy Ghost role may rotate for this creation ... i.e. been rumored that Joseph Smith filled it at one time. The temple clearly teaches that each of us can become the role of Adam (temple is a future glimps, not a history leason)

Also, the Adam/God theory that Fundamentalists preach today is different. I'm pretty certain they identify Adam as being also Eloheim, but Brigham Young did not make that identification.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _RockSlider »

Jason Bourne wrote:
...
BY certainly did teach Adam God and he institutionalized it the the temple endowment at the St George Temple.
...
But he did teach it for over 25 year.


agreed, you guys need to find a copy of the "Lecture at the Veil"
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _RockSlider »

Digging into my old papers ... anyone ever see a document published by Craig L. Tholson, 1991, Titled "Adam-God, Doctrines of the restoration volume 1?

Chapter 9 The St. George Endowment and Chapter 10 The Bunkerville Problem are a good read

edit: I also believe the King Follett Discourse did link the original teaches to pre BY
_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Re: Adam-God Theory

Post by _Alter Idem »

RockSlider wrote:
...
BY certainly did teach Adam God and he institutionalized it the the temple endowment at the St George Temple.
...
But he did teach it for over 25 year.


agreed, you guys need to find a copy of the "Lecture at the Veil"[/quote]

Here's FAIR's take on the lecture at the veil--

http://en.fairmormon.org/Adam-God_and_t ... he_Veil%22
Every man is a moon and has a [dark] side which he turns toward nobody; you have to slip around behind if you want to see it. ---Mark Twain
Post Reply