DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
I just informed the Moderator that the signature line of DCP is in bold red letters. That is not allowed. Red letters are for mods only.
Paul O
Paul O
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Paul Osborne wrote:I just informed the Moderator that the signature line of DCP is in bold red letters. That is not allowed. Red letters are for mods only.
Paul O
Has the sig color changed?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
harmony wrote:Paul Osborne wrote:I just informed the Moderator that the signature line of DCP is in bold red letters. That is not allowed. Red letters are for mods only.
Paul O
Has the sig color changed?
No it hasn't changed!
"Parting is such sweet sorrow!"
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Where are you Harmony? Are you in the kitchen or what? Taking a bath? Gee wizzz, women!!
You need to fix DCP's red signature line and feel free to unbold it too. He is breaking the board rules by using red writing. It must be stopped now!
Hurry!
Paul O
You need to fix DCP's red signature line and feel free to unbold it too. He is breaking the board rules by using red writing. It must be stopped now!
Hurry!
Paul O
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Paul Osborne wrote:Where are you Harmony? Are you in the kitchen or what? Taking a bath? Gee wizzz, women!!
You need to fix DCP's red signature line and feel free to unbold it too. He is breaking the board rules by using red writing. It must be stopped now!
Hurry!
Paul O
Sorry, Paul. I don't have that kind of power. At least, not that I know of. I think only Shades can change a person's profile. He's admin; I'm just a mod.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
My understanding of the rule is that it's only against board rules to use red when acting as a "pseudo-mod". When it's not obvious to readers whether it was written by the poster or a mod.
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Sorry, Paul. I don't have that kind of power. At least, not that I know of. I think only Shades can change a person's profile. He's admin; I'm just a mod
O. M. G!
Ok, let's wait for Shades to fix it. Do let him know. Thanks for trying.
Paul O
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Ray A wrote:My understanding of the rule is that it's only against board rules to use red when acting as a "pseudo-mod". When it's not obvious to readers whether it was written by the poster or a mod.
I think the rule pretty much rules out red ink period from beginning to end.
That's how I see it.
Paul O
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Paul Osborne wrote:I think the rule pretty much rules out red ink period from beginning to end.
That's how I see it.
What does it matter anyway? He's safely locked away in the MAD echo-chamber now.
Re: DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign
Ray A wrote:Paul Osborne wrote:I think the rule pretty much rules out red ink period from beginning to end.
That's how I see it.
What does it matter anyway? He's safely locked away in the MAD echo-chamber now.
Well, it's true he is locked up in MAD and well protected by the guards. But all the same, I want to see the red writing go away. That's Shade's call but I think the red will turn black just as soon as Shades hears about it.
Paul O