Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.

Should posting in real life information about meambers of this board be disciplined?

 
Total votes: 0

_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _MCB »

IMHO, given the level of paranoia that people experience in their journey away from Mormonism, we need to be somewhat cautious. For example, I could have been banned for life in identifying "madeline," an old friend from another board.

OK. Here it is. Please make suggestions for revision quickly, as substantial changes will invalidate the poll. Ok, I already made a change, as per St. Paul.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _madeleine »

ha. I don't have any in real life information out there. Not because I worry about Mormons. I'm just a private person and don't think the world needs to know everything about me.

But, I don't care if people know I post on other forums besides this one. With the exception of whine me. He's a weird stalker person.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_Paul Osborne

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _Paul Osborne »

Ok, I don't care if people think I'm stupid.

But I have a simple question and I want you to answer it, please.

What in the hell does in real life stand for? You assume people just know. Well, they don't. I don't! So what do you think of that? Does that make me stupid? Does it make me lazy for not Googling it? Whatever, but I honestly don't know what in real life stands for.

Thank you in advance.

Paul O
_Rambo
_Emeritus
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _Rambo »

Paul Osborne wrote:Ok, I don't care if people think I'm stupid.

But I have a simple question and I want you to answer it, please.

What in the hell does in real life stand for? You assume people just know. Well, they don't. I don't! So what do you think of that? Does that make me stupid? Does it make me lazy for not Googling it? Whatever, but I honestly don't know what in real life stands for.

Thank you in advance.

Paul O


Hi Paul, it stands for "in real life" it took me a while to get that one. I don't think your stupid because I don't know what my wife and DH stands for. I know they mean husband and wife but what is with the D does that stand for designated, dumb, dimwitted, dillweed, darling.....?
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _madeleine »

D is for dear, or darling.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_Paul Osborne

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _Paul Osborne »

Actually, "d" is for . . . . well, I better not say it. But I'm thinking all about it.

Would you like to guess the word that starts with a "d" that I'm thinking about? It's about something that really excites me and feels soooooooooo good.

I better go now. Have a nice day.

Paul O
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _madeleine »

daiquiri?

drama?

dancing?
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_Paul Osborne

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _Paul Osborne »

madeleine wrote:daiquiri?

drama?

dancing?


Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.

Paul O
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _madeleine »

Paul Osborne wrote:
madeleine wrote:daiquiri?

drama?

dancing?


Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.

Paul O


Oh, I see. I only use those words with the DH.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

madeleine wrote:
Paul Osborne wrote:
Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.

Paul O


Oh, I see. I only use those words with the DH.
???

D__kH__d?

haha
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
Post Reply