madeleine wrote:Daniel Peterson wrote:We wouldn't use the term minister -- we don't even use it for our "clergy" -- but I can see how and why one might.
OK.
Why? (Just curious.)
I don't think there's any real weighty reason. It's just a community linguistic habit. We simply tend not to use the noun minister to refer to our leaders, etc. The word, to Mormon ears -- I haven't done a scholarly study, but I think I have some ear for LDS usage and dialect -- probably connotes a paid or professional person to most Latter-day Saints. So we would tend to say, if asked, that we don't have "ministers."
I have two acquaintances, one a stake president in Utah and the other a former area seventy in Canada, who both use the term ministry to refer to their work in the Church. They refer to "my ministry." This usage -- although it's scriptural, and although it's occasionally used with reference to presidents of the Church and to apostles -- has always struck me, because it's unusual among contemporary Latter-day Saints.