My Column in the "Mormon Times"

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:My new column is out.

But "Mormon Times" has restructured in some way, and I'm sitting in a lecture hall with only an iPhone.


What does "restructured" mean?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _moksha »

Daniel Peterson wrote: .

Google "Deseret News Peterson Faith Trust."


I have always considered trust to be a multi-leveled concept. At the top would be the cosmic level - something akin to night following day. Toward the bottom would be more iffy things like whether my daughter will burn the frying pan if she tries to cook something.

Where does trust in God fall on this scale? My guess is that while many religious people would claim to have a cosmic level of trust, if money were riding on some occurrence they would pick night following day.

.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Joey
_Emeritus
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _Joey »


Another great article for those being "persecuted"! Only in Provo!
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

I'm from California, I live in Orem, and the paper is published in Salt Lake.

How is this "only in Provo"?

And the article wasn't about "persecution."

Have you ever thought about trying to make at least minimal sense?
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _madeleine »

How is the Mormon trek west comparative to Israel, and not to say, the many times humans have set out in groups to move from A to B? It is a very human behavior, not exceptional in the larger picture of human history. Though, in the history of the settlement of the western US, it is noteworthy.

Israel was made exceptional by God, as a Chosen People, with miracles in their wanderings and Exodus, that is indicative of God's Saving Grace, which is perfected in Jesus Christ.

So we are a made a Chosen People, royal, members of Christ's High Priesthood, through Jesus Christ, not by our wanderings and/or persecutions. Which for Mormons, are lacking in miracles. No pillar of fire, water flowing from rocks, manna from heaven. Why? Because all of these things pre-figure Jesus Christ, who sanctified the waters of baptism, is our pillar of fire, and is the Bread of Life.

In the mythology of Mormon pioneers....what point is there that is greater than this?
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

madeleine wrote:How is the Mormon trek west comparative to Israel, and not to say, the many times humans have set out in groups to move from A to B? It is a very human behavior, not exceptional in the larger picture of human history. Though, in the history of the settlement of the western US, it is noteworthy.

I think you're reading into my article something that I didn't say.

I said that the trek westward was a principal factor in creating a sense of peoplehood or ethnicity for the Latter-day Saints, and I also said that, in their peoplehood or quasi-ethnicity, Mormons are somewhat like Jews. But I didn't claim a direct causal relationship between the two. I didn't argue for, or even say, that the Mormon migration to the West was comparable to the Israelite exodus from Egypt.

However, certain comparisons were made from the very time itself, by the participants: They were the "wandering camp of Israel," led by "the American Moses" (Brigham Young), crossing dry shod over the Mississippi River on ice as the Israelites crossed the Red Sea on dry ground, fed by flocks of quail as were the Israelites, passing Mount Pisgah as the Israelites did, coming to a land where a river (which they named the "Jordan") linked a freshwater lake and a freshwater lake, building temples and tabernacles, presided over by patriarchs and prophets, in a place they called "Zion," and etc., and etc., and etc.

madeleine wrote:Israel was made exceptional by God, as a Chosen People, with miracles in their wanderings and Exodus, that is indicative of God's Saving Grace, which is perfected in Jesus Christ.

True.

madeleine wrote:So we are a made a Chosen People, royal, members of Christ's High Priesthood, through Jesus Christ, not by our wanderings and/or persecutions.

True. I never said otherwise.

madeleine wrote:Which for Mormons, are lacking in miracles.

That's debatable.

madeleine wrote:No pillar of fire, water flowing from rocks, manna from heaven. Why? Because all of these things pre-figure Jesus Christ, who sanctified the waters of baptism, is our pillar of fire, and is the Bread of Life.

Debatable theology, too.

madeleine wrote:In the mythology of Mormon pioneers....what point is there that is greater than this?

No point -- in anything -- is greater than Christ.

That's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:That's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history.


Whoa. Sure there is. I'm in Mormonism. ;-)
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:That's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history.

Whoa. Sure there is. I'm in Mormonism. ;-)

I grant your point, of course.

Far be it from me to disagree with you on such a matter.

But I didn't say "There's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history." I said "That's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history." The That referred to the fact that no point, of or in any story, is greater than Christ.
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: My Column in the "Mormon Times"

Post by _madeleine »

Daniel Peterson wrote:No point --


Well, that is what I was thinking.

in anything -- is greater than Christ.

That's no defect in Mormonism or in Mormon history.


Not sure how history can have a defect. But Mormonism....that's debatable.
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
Post Reply