subgenius wrote:The O'Don article uses the word "force(d)" - 37 times, "choose" -3 times "chose(n)"- 5 times. He scatters about quotes seasoned with his bias notions of the great persecution of the homosexual...blah blah blah. Bottom line was that no one was forced against their will to attend BYU and receive aversion therapy, and all universities have guinea-pig-students sign a release, duh. His self-noted obsession with homosexuality and Mormons is peculiar (to say the least) totaling some "8 lineal feet". There is little credibility given his resume and the actual historic documents he provides show little worth towards any significant means of condemnation.
Maybe i missed the big apologetic "lie" on this topic, but again, i did doze off.
Whoa. There are several things wrong with the underlined statement.
1. certainly not all universities engaged in electroshock studies on homosexual men.
2. any studies done by universities always have papers written about those studies. Where is BYU's paper on the electroshock studies?
3. non-disclosure statements are definitely NOT the norm in university studies.
Good grief. Back up the bus and clarify what you really meant, because what you said is not correct.