Assuming that BC the author of this dichotomy says: "No it is a valid dichotomy."
Then let us impose it as a condition and follow some of the logical questions that emerge.
Given that Pres. Faust was a democrat, was he a good Mormon?
If yes, the the dichotomy is false and the author has no credibility.
Nevertheless:
If yes, did you BC ever raise your hand to sustain this member of the democrat party?
If so, does that not make you (who sustained Pres. Faust) by extension, supporting the democrat party?
"Do you support, affiliate with, or agree with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?
Romans 1:32
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
So by BC's logic; is anyone who has raised a hand to sustain Pres. Faust as a prophet seer and revelator, also supported and affiliated with the democrats and as such are unworthy to enter the temple?
As the recommend question mentions individuals, by sustaining or agreeing with pres. Faust or his teachings are you not by extension supporting or agreeing with an individual who has practices contrary to those accepted by the church?
Do the same questions apply to Marlin K Jensen?
If no; Pres. Faust is not a good Mormon. Was he (pres. Faust) a false prophet?
Is Bro. Jensen (a Member of the 1st Quorum of the 70 and an self admitted democrat) a good Mormon?
So many questions emerge as the logical consequences of this proposition.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.
Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin