Zimmerman Arrested

[_ldsfaqs]

You are right....

Of course, he shouldn't have been charged at all, and then the special prosecuter had the gal to LIE and say they weren't doing anything because of political pressure. Further, they skipped the grand jury, further proving that lie.

What liberals ignore is that the entire reason he was released in the first place and not arrested, save temporarily detained while the facts were investigated, is because all the evidence clearly showed it was self defense. He had grass stains on his back, he had a bloody nose and gash on his head which paramedics cleaned up (hence why no blood in the video (stupid liberals)), AND there was a witness from the beginning that saw Zimmerman walking away, Trayvon cold cocking Zimmerman in the face, and then beating Zimmermans head in the ground.

It doesn't matter that Zimmerman was simply checking on the guy, making sure he wasn't doing anything. That's not illegal. Trayvon was clearly an immoral punk, as other evidence shows, and that he got exactly what he deserved. Scumbags don't have a right to beat on people simply because they don't like them looking at them. Hands are deadly weapons also. One blow can kill someone. Zimmerman had every right to defend himself.

[_ajax18]

I think we're going to be hearing about this for at least a year now. A poster over at NewOderMormon caught onto a very important part of the media bias

I'm REALLY PISSED that this case has all the attention because the kid was black, BUT there is no president jumping on the bandwagon to defend a white victim (age 13) who was just burned in Kansas by two black kids who called him "Whitie' as he burned. Where is all the attention there? Huh???? Huh???? Here is the link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU07MVS0KJs

I'm done getting worked up about this one. Let the browns and blacks fight this one out. I still can't believe CNN was stupid enough to jump on this case thinking it would fit their evil southern white men theme. I guess they just got in to deep to retract their error at this point.

[_Morley]

I think we're going to be hearing about this for at least a year now. A poster over at NewOderMormon caught onto a very important part of the media bias

I'm REALLY PISSED that this case has all the attention because the kid was black, BUT there is no president jumping on the bandwagon to defend a white victim (age 13) who was just burned in Kansas by two black kids who called him "Whitie' as he burned. Where is all the attention there? Huh???? Huh???? Here is the link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU07MVS0KJs

I'm done getting worked up about this one. Let the browns and blacks fight this one out. I still can't believe CNN was stupid enough to jump on this case thinking it would fit their evil southern white men theme. I guess they just got in to deep to retract their error at this point.

Your link is dead. So is your argument.

[_Paul Kemp]

I'm glad that the Internet exists for this reason:

Those LDS who delight in the death of one of the "blacks," an unarmed candy gobbling "punk," will have their remarks forever immortalized for the public to see.

Imagine an undecided voter researching Mormonism on the Internet because of the Republican candidate's religious persuasion and coming across comments from an author labeled as ldsfaqs like those above. I mean, ldsfaqs presumably stands for Latter-day Saint frequently asked questions, a somewhat authoritative title, and this thread chronicles how delighted the LDS frequently asked questions poster is with the death of an unarmed, innocent black child. It's as if the poster is implying that the entire Mormon faith is behind him, and the other posters here are reinforcing that. Brilliant work, folks. Keep it up!

[_ajax18]

Try this one then

http://twoguys2012.wordpress.com/2012/0 ... ent-obama/

Early March in Kansas City Missouri, a 13 year old White boy was chased to his doorstep by two Black boys, who doused him with gasoline and lit him on fire, while yelling, “This is what you deserve, White boy.”

Unlike the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin situation, this attempted immolation of a 13 year old boy was CLEARLY motivated by racism on the part of the criminals.

Yet, this horrific story disappears down the memory-hole as soon as the media can dispense with it. The race-baiters have nothing to say about the racism involved. Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan, and Obama have nothing to say. No teachable moments here, apparently.

Right Mr. Obama? No wisdom for you to dispense using this Black-on-White hate crime as a convenient backdrop?

I guess when victims “look like” your fictitious son, you must rise to the occasion use them to serve your Leftist aspirations. But when victims look like my sons, you have nothing to say.

Mr. Obama, you sir, are a blatant racist. If you’re going to continue to divide Americans along whatever lines you can find to divide, so be it. But I’m finished pretending that you are a well-intentioned ideologue.

Jackson, Sharpton, and Farrakhan have their man in the White House.

Morley the fact that Zimmerman turned out to be a hisspanic sure took the wind out of their demands to make this a hate crime. He said, "coon," that makes it a hate crime. Oh darn, he's not white so we can't charge him with racism.

[_just me]

Um, did those boys not get arrested? I think that is the difference.

[_ajax18]

This link is a better

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWkuC3qnhCU

Were the perpetrators actually arrested? Everywhere I looked said that they were still looking for them and the school would not release any information on whether they would be at the public school waiting for the victim when he makes it back to school.

Even so, I don't see the major news networks trying to convict these boys on television. I bet nothing happens to them for what they did and if it weren't for internet, mainstream media would have hidden this from the general population. When nothing happens to these perpetrators, even though they may get arrested, we won't see huge "peaceful" protests nor one iota of coverage from the mainstream media.

[_ludwigm]

[_moksha]

Maybe it's because I am an old guy, but I would never think of accosting any teenager on his way home with some candy. When you go looking for trouble you are bound to find it.

[_ldsfaqs]

I'm glad that the Internet exists for this reason:

Those LDS who delight in the death of one of the "blacks," an unarmed candy gobbling "punk," will have their remarks forever immortalized for the public to see.

I'm also glad the internet exists, so those who LIE about others, misrepresenting their words wholesale can be seen by all, and then people can know who the ACTUAL bad people are, people like YOU.

1. I never "delighted" in anyones death. LIAR!
2. What I did delight in is that the TRUTH could be known, contrary to Liberals like you who LIE and misrepresent the truth, and I delighted in the fact that a person defended himself as he had every right to from an a physical assault.
3. Further, he was a punk, if you saw his Twitter username, his Twitter posts, his most recent pictures, etc. He wasn't one of the "great moraled" people of society.

Imagine an undecided voter researching Mormonism on the Internet because of the Republican candidate's religious persuasion and coming across comments from an author labeled as ldsfaqs like those above. I mean, ldsfaqs presumably stands for Latter-day Saint frequently asked questions, a somewhat authoritative title, and this thread chronicles how delighted the LDS frequently asked questions poster is with the death of an unarmed, innocent black child. It's as if the poster is implying that the entire Mormon faith is behind him, and the other posters here are reinforcing that. Brilliant work, folks. Keep it up!

Yes, imagine such a voter reads my words and doesn't LIE about them like you do, but takes they as they actually are, and more so then reads your lies, and then reads this response which makes your lies even more clear.

That person because he's actually objective, will know who the true immoral people are. It's not me or LDS.