subgenius wrote:Buffalo wrote:...You started with a strawman, and your reasoning degenerated from there. Who is arguing that "consciousness is created by chemistry" exactly?
strawman? what strawman?
....if only you had a brain
The conscious being a chemical reaction product was a given, by me......so, why was it a given?
simple..because if you do not believe in the supernatural then the consciousness must be natural, and as such it must be an adherent to natural laws. Now, if you consider the consciousness to be a product of something other than the neuro-chemical processes that occur in the brain, then please, provide your proof and evidence that it is....but wait...we already know your position....no straw neededBuffalo wrote:It all comes back to the brain - the one and only source of consciousness.
viewtopic.php?p=577330#p577330
...or would you rather revise your position and rely on the old standard "we don't know yet" defense...which, my friend, means the "supernatural"....but your faith is admirable.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supernatural
unless you are proposing some sort of other reality that is neither supernatural nor observable/visible?
Nevertheless, you lose.
Again, you don't seem to be addressing anyone's arguments but your own. To hear you tell it, scientists believe the skull acts as some sort of bone beaker, full of some cocktail of bubbling chemicals. The brain is not a flagon of chemicals. It is a highly complex organ. When you talk about consciousness as a "chemical reaction" you're not describing anyone's scientific viewpoint.
If you'd care to try to educate yourself quickly on how the brain works and start again, I'd be all ears. :)