Catherine Aurelia wrote:Here's how I see this move. In order to survive, the Mormon church is going to have to stop trying to cover up its history and start dealing with it.
arguably "cover-up" is a means to "deal" with it...however, the Catholic church has done alright by ignoring people who strain gnats...i suppose the LDS church will be just fine.
Catherine Aurelia wrote:In order to attract today's more educated populace,
an obvious assumption on your part...."more" educated?..how? do you mean by the notion that anything and everything posted on the internet being equivalent to educational? (not sure i follow your logic there).
Catherine Aurelia wrote:the church must deal with the fact that Joseph Smith was a shaman who pretty much led a bunch of credulous followers.
speculation and opinion on your part....do you have an actual argument in your bag of tricks.
Catherine Aurelia wrote: He was able to manipulate very simple people, convincing them that he was in touch with God, and that he, in fact, was "god" to the Mormons (and if they didn't like it, they could go ahead and lump it).
see previous comment
Catherine Aurelia wrote:Mormons try to rationalize away Smith "marrying" young teenie boppers (as young as 14), besides his own foster daughters. Now, most TBMs will try to cover this up with pseudo-intellectual gibberish, but the fact remains that Smith was simply paving the way for Jones and Koresh, who also engaged in questionable sexual acts, using "religion" as a cover to justify their sexual lust.
see previous comment
Catherine Aurelia wrote:However, when the rest of the world looks at Smith's perversions (especially marrying teenagers and the wives of other men), they aren't so quick to dismiss this as some kind of God-directed act demanded by a sword-wielding angel. Rather, more sophisticated people see through Smith's claims to divine guidance when it comes to his immoral sexual acts. Any woman should!
actually, most people are just obsessed with sex and thus can not see anything else..their obsession (and yours) is more revealing about their own character. This Puritanical measure is often ironic considering the crowd that levies it.
Catherine Aurelia wrote:On another issue, today's modern, less credulous population isn't so quick to embrace a book which describes a non-existent civilization, written on gold plates in a non-existent language. Now, Peterson and his staff can spend literally thousands of hours defending the Book of Mormon, but the bottom line is that those hours are wasted on promoting a myth. There is no other explanation for the total lack of artifact evidence, regardless of the highly speculative statements issued by Mormon "apologists."
Obviously you are confused about what type of text the Book of Mormon actually is.
as for artifacts...if this is your litmus test, then what a small and narrow world must surround you.
Catherine Aurelia wrote:So, how to save the church? Perhaps the Community of Christ has paved the way. Give token allegiance to Smith, but acknowledge his life as fallen and debased in many ways. Give lipservice to the Book of Mormon, but see it more in terms of pious literature rather than an actual narrative of real events. Begin to dialogue with genuine Christians.
"genuine Christians"?...oh please, grace us with your legitimate definition of what a genuine christian must surely be....please?
You are sadly mistaken...for it is the "genuine Christian" which much first recognize that they are not at all genuine and come forth and begin the dialogue with us...much like you are doing now.
Catherine Aurelia wrote:Perhaps this is the beginning of change. Who knows!
i know...and it ain't the change you are thinking of.