son of Ishmael wrote:
Wow Jo you are really on a roll. The point of my comments is that it seems that God only answers the prayers of very few people. I can't imagine a prayer more sincere than that of a man whose children are starving to death. Yet your answer is "Well you should have controlled your sex drive and had less children." If God is omnipotent, I would think he could find a way to answer that man's prayer without violating the prime directive of screwing with people's free agency if he wanted to. Maybe he just doesn't want to.
I see that you put your own twist on what you thought I said. My comment about the sex drive was "should God take away their sex drive"; In other words, should He take away their free agency (and one of the few choices that can at least bring them momentary happiness).
by the way I do give a good portion of my income to help the needy. Since I don't pay tithing to the COB anymore I have money that can actually go to a good cause.
It is very easy and very safe to write a check. Do you know for a certainty that the money you are donating is being used the way it is being claimed to be used?
This still does not put your actions where your mouth is. Instead of being so critical about what you think someone else is or isn't doing, you sure don't seem sincerely anxious to place your own well being at stake by placing it into the fire. If you aren't willing to actually do something with your physical presence in a poverty stricken country where people are starving, then you have no room to complain and use a standard against others which you are not willing to follow yourself.
So, if YOU were God, how would you handle it? It is a simple thing to be critical; and you have a very strong opinion about how He's handling things. Let's see what solutions you can come up with, and allow the rest of us to review them and give our opinions about them.
Blessings,
jo