subgenius wrote:no problem at all - except for the obvious myopia by prickkicker.
Who says the HG was not involved in the preparation for the talks and for the prayers offered?
The idea that each talk is to be inspired in the moment is rather out of step with church practices. Sacrament talks are quite often prepared, accompanied by notes, etc...
So, whatever prickkicker is trying to insinuate is way off the mark, because he conveys inadequate understanding of the principle involved.
It is as if he expects there to be a hat full of topics and only after an inspired seat number is called out and that person approaches the podium are they allowed to retrieve their topic...sure that would be entertaining, but if its a light show and spirit band you are after then go to a baptist church.
as for magic, that wholly depends on him and quite obviously that "magic" has long since withdrawn.
Is my question incomprehensible?
I read it over and as far as I can see it is a direct question in plain text so the insinuation is not hidden...
My follow up question already preempts your lame excuse, in the form of a rhetorical question.
I see you need the question repeated, but in even plainer and more direct speech, which I predict you will ignore as you always do (an observed modus operandi) when you're asked a direct question, with which you rebuffed... I also preempt your favoured acronym, 'CFR' and refer you to all of your old posts, and call everyone who has ever asked you a direct question as my witnesses.
I will Reword and clarify my concerns that provoke my questions for those with difficulty reading plain English.
Since when was reading, the prewritten, same old stories, over and over, inspiration, seership, revelation, and, prophecy, from, or through, the Holy Ghoul?
And Do they not have faith, that the Lord God will inspire them at the time of the address, through his messenger the Holy Ghost right there and then or must it be prewritten and analysed through proofreaders and legal teams first?