Drifting wrote:You really don't contribute anything of substance to any thread do you...
to be fair, there was no substance to begin with.
Drifting wrote:Why don't you show how the General Authority of God's one true Church, Elder Cook, got his facts right and that indeed these five/two things that he lists are 'prevalent' reasons for members being less committed.
i believe the quote is as follows:
"While anything that lessens commitment is of consequence, two relevant challenges are both prevalent and significant. The first is unkindness, violence, and domestic abuse. The second is sexual immorality and impure thoughts." (emphasis mine)
It is grammatically obvious that Elder Cook's list are things that he considers to "lessen" a member's commitment. Which hardly seem necessary to "prove" as they are rather obvious...no science necessary.
However, he also notes that they are "relevant"...which implies that the blathering criticism about out-dated and meaningless church history is not relevant - sure it can lessen a commitment...but not in a relevant way....that too is rather obvious.
Now, i find it ironic that on one thread you can demand that the inspiration, prophecy, seers, etc... should have been evident in GC!
but when it is evident you immediately demand proof!...you want the facts that must have surely composed the "revelation"...yet for a GA to assert that public morality is more and more tolerant of promiscuity and violence requires "fact" for you...as if 2+2=4 needs to be proven before you will proceed.
the workings of your criticisms are rather slippery....snake-like even.