Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _ludwigm »

LittleNipper wrote:
ludwigm wrote:Yes. And I am Julius Caesar.
According to who or what?
Me.

As all other prophets, seers, revelators...
... poets, preachers, chiefs or wizards reveal/spout it (see my signature).

Have the writers of old/new testaments
- name?
- permanent address?
- identity card?
- email address?
- phone number?
- tax number?

I have all of the above.
I exist - more than that shadows from the past.

Don't You belive ME?
Do You believe Moses?
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Gunnar »

DrW wrote:
PrickKicker wrote:You do realise that JOB is a fictional character, Right?
Or in your mind is he like the flood and literal?

Believing that Job was a real person who lived in the belly of a big cetacean takes a lot less delusional thinking than does belief in a literal global flood from rain within the last 10,000 years.

by the way: Tarski and I had a discussion about this before Little Nipper joined the board. We pretty much agreed that putting the amount of additional water needed to cover the earth into the atmosphere would require the Earth's surface to be at a temperature well above the boiling point of water (in fact well above 400 degrees C) and would result in a pressure at the surface on the order of 90 bar (more than 1,000 psi) as I recall.

The Earth with enough water in the atmosphere to cover its surface would have an environment more like that of Venus. Noah and his family would have been boiled and crushed at the same time.

Simple physics.

It appears that you have confused the story of Job with the story of Jonah. Jonah was the one who was swallowed by a whale. I agree with you, though, that Job was almost certainly a fictional character. I strongly suspect that even the original author of Job never intended for it to be taken as literally true--any more than Jesus, in the new testament, intended for his parables to be taken as literally true.

Jonah, on the other hand, may well have been a real person, as someone by that name (Jonah the son of Amittai) was mentioned in 2 Kings, 14:25, which is one of the historical books of The Bible. According to Asimov's Guide to the Bible, Jonah flourished in the time of Jeroboam II around 780 BCE.

Nevertheless, the Book of Jonah itself is clearly fictional, and was most likely written by some anonymous Judean around the time of Ezra and Nehemiah after the return of the Jews from Babylonian Exile. We know this, according to Asimov, because Scholars of ancient Hebrew and Middle Eastern history have determined that it was written using phraseology and language that was contemporary with that used in the time of Ezra and Nehemiah (around 300 BCE). Besides that, the Book of Jonah contains anachronisms that preclude it from having actually been written during the time of the historical Jonah (around 780 BCE). For example: In the Book of Jonah, He was sent to convert the people of Nineveh, which is described as "'that great city,' the capital of the Assyrian Empire." This is an anachronism because at the time of the historical Jonah, the capital of Assyria was Calah, as it had been for five centuries. Nineveh was then only a small provincial town, which did not become the capital of the Assyrian Empire until a century or so after the time of Jonah. Besides that, there is no record in the historical books of The Bible (I Kings through II Chronicles) of any such dramatic conversion and change of heart on the part of Nineveh ever having taken place (nor is this mentioned in any other ancient historical record anywhere). Even if such a conversion of the Assyrians had taken place, it certainly didn't last very long, because it didn't prevent the Assyrians from brutally conquering and/or oppressing their neighboring kingdoms and peoples (including Israel and Judah) during, and especially soon after the time of the historical Jonah.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

ludwigm wrote:Yes. And I am Julius Caesar. According to who or what?Me.

As all other prophets, seers, revelators...
... poets, preachers, chiefs or wizards reveal/spout it (see my signature).

Have the writers of old/new testaments
- name?
- permanent address?
- identity card?
- email address?
- phone number?
- tax number?

I have all of the above.
I exist - more than that shadows from the past.

Don't You belive ME?
Do You believe Moses?

You might be "a" Julius Ceasar; however, you are not "the" Julius Ceasar.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

DrW wrote:
PrickKicker wrote:You do realise that JOB is a fictional character, Right?
Or in your mind is he like the flood and literal?

Believing that Job was a real person who lived in the belly of a big cetacean takes a lot less delusional thinking than does belief in a literal global flood from rain within the last 10,000 years.

by the way: Tarski and I had a discussion about this before Little Nipper joined the board. We pretty much agreed that putting the amount of additional water needed to cover the earth into the atmosphere would require the Earth's surface to be at a temperature well above the boiling point of water (in fact well above 400 degrees C) and would result in a pressure at the surface on the order of 90 bar (more than 1,000 psi) as I recall.

The Earth with enough water in the atmosphere to cover its surface would have an environment more like that of Venus. Noah and his family would have been boiled and crushed at the same time.

Simple physics.


The reality is that since the surface of the earth was smoother, and since much of the water was housed underground, the prospect of a massive flood is very easy to support. Even easier than the promotion that it was Job who was in the belly of a Great Fish. :lol:
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _DrW »

Double Post
Last edited by Guest on Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _DrW »

LittleNipper wrote:The reality is that since the surface of the earth was smoother, and since much of the water was housed underground, the prospect of a massive flood is very easy to support. Even easier than the promotion that it was Job who was in the belly of a Great Fish. :lol:

Okay. I am embarrassed. Sorry for confusing Job and Jonah. Both are mythical characters from the Old Testament, but that is no excuse. Since I assume that, as a biblical literalist, you do believe the story of Jonah as well, I went ahead and fixed my earlier post. If you do not believe the story of Jonah, I would be interested to know why.

With regard to your claim that the Earth was smoother 4,000 years ago than it is now, I would be interested in the geology text that provides any evidence for this. However (and I checked this again) the Great Flood of the Old Testament was described as arising from 40 days and 40 nights of rain, not the sudden opening of artesian wells.

But I can see it doesn't matter because you are probably going to continue to believe in your fantasies, against all the evidence to the contrary.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

DrW wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:The reality is that since the surface of the earth was smoother, and since much of the water was housed underground, the prospect of a massive flood is very easy to support. Even easier than the promotion that it was Job who was in the belly of a Great Fish. :lol:

Okay. I am embarrassed. Sorry for confusing Job and Jonah. Both are mythical characters from the Old Testament, but that is no excuse. Since I assume that, as a biblical literalist, you do believe the story of Jonah as well, I went ahead and fixed my earlier post. If you do not believe the story of Jonah, I would be interested to know why.

With regard to your claim that the Earth was smoother 4,000 years ago than it is now, I would be interested in the geology text that provides any evidence for this. However (and I checked this again) the Great Flood of the Old Testament was described as arising from 40 days and 40 nights of rain, not the sudden opening of artesian wells.

But I can see it doesn't matter because you are probably going to continue to believe in your fantasies, against all the evidence to the contrary.

I would like to see the any geological text that can prove anything different. And the Bible says that it rained continuously for forty days and forty nights: HOWEVER, see Genesis chapter 7, verse 11. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month -- on that day ALL the springs of the great deep burst forth and ALL the floodgates of heaven were open.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _DrW »

LittleNipper wrote:I would like to see the any geological text that can prove anything different. And the Bible says that it rained continuously for forty days and forty nights: HOWEVER, see Genesis chapter 7, verse 11. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month -- on that day ALL the springs of the great deep burst forth and ALL the floodgates of heaven were open.


Little Nipper,

As a matter of fact, I have been reading an excellent book on the geological history of Arabia, which because of its oil reserves, has a very thoroughly researched and well understood geological history. Before describing for you some of the evidence for the real age of the Earth from the geological record in Arabia, which extends back well over 800 million years, I have three requests for you.

1. Please put an upper limit on the age of the Earth according to the Bible as you read it, and state whether agree with the time frame (4,800 year ago) commonly claimed by Bible literalists for the global flood.

2. Please let me know how "smooth" the Earth would have been in Noah's time, given that the Bible says that Noah's Arc came to rest on a mountain. If you can give me a height for the top of this mountain on which Noah's Arc came to rest, according to the Bible in which you believe, I can provide a first order calculation of the amount of water that would have been required to cover it, along with the rest of the Earth, and then you can answer the following question:

3. If there was enough water on the Earth to cover its surface entirely, including the mountain on which the Arc finally came to rest, where do you think all of that water went? Where is it now?
Last edited by Guest on Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _Drifting »

DrW wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:I would like to see the any geological text that can prove anything different. And the Bible says that it rained continuously for forty days and forty nights: HOWEVER, see Genesis chapter 7, verse 11. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month -- on that day ALL the springs of the great deep burst forth and ALL the floodgates of heaven were open.


Little Nipper,

As a matter of fact, I have been reading an excellent book on the geological history of Arabia, which because of its oil reserves, has a very thoroughly researched and has a well understood geological history. Before describing for you some of the evidence for the real age of the Earth from the geological record in Arabia, which extends back well over 800 million years, I have three requests for you.

1. Please put an upper limit on the age of the Earth according to the Bible as you read it, and state whether agree with the time frame (4,800 year ago) commonly claimed by Bible literalists for the global flood.

2. Please let me know "smooth" the Earth would have been in Noah's time, given that the Bible says that Noah's Arc came to rest on a mountain. If you can give me a height for the top of this mountain on which Noah's Arc came to rest, according to the Bible in which you believe, I can provide a first order calculation of the amount of water that would have been required to cover it, along with the rest of the Earth, and then you can answer the following question:

3. If there was enough water on the Earth to cover its surface entirely, including the mountain on which the Arc finally came to rest, where do you think all of that water went? Where is it now?


The answer to 3. (regardless of the answers to 1. and 2.) will be "God dunnit with magic".
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Why I don't believe the story of the Great Flood...

Post by _LittleNipper »

The ocean presently is 7 miles deep. Mount where the Ark came to rest likely grew higher as the Flood receeded.
Post Reply