Eric wrote:Darth J wrote:By the way, Pahoran, feel free to tell Dr. Peterson that I still have his possibly defamatory PM to me about Eric from July 2010 in my inbox. He won't mind if I share it with Eric, will he?
It would mean the world to me if you shared this with me, Darth J. Please PM me if you want to discuss this further. I've been collecting defamatory posts by Dr. Peterson for purposes I'd gladly share with you in private.
Thanks in advance.
Pahoran wrote:...
Just above, you see Darth and Eric gleefully offering to exchange in real life information they claim to have about Dan as well ...
Let's see.
Eric, already aware that DCP has sent at least one message to someone else stating that Eric is a mentally deranged serial liar and general bad guy, would like to see any other messages that DCP has sent about him.
And Pahoran calls this "gleefully offering to exchange in real life information"? As if the identity "Daniel Peterson' was some kind of anonymous internet moniker like "Pahoran", or even "Chap", for instance, used by people who want to keep their in real life ("In Real Life") identity secret while they post on boards like this?
I just don't get it. Daniel Peterson, a
real person whose real life identity is public knowledge, and who makes no attempt to conceal that identity, sends people such as Darth J messages about Eric signed with his in real life name, with (so far as I know) no prior request that those messages should be kept confidential, and it is in some way a nefarious disclosure of "in real life information" to talk about them?
Oh well. Just another attempt at rhetorical sleight of hand by a master of the craft, I suppose, but this time Pahoran can't quite pull it off.