Brad Hudson wrote:Frankly, this finally proves to me that you just don't know what you are talking about. Do you really think you can just add water to the top of the land and not have it run down into the ocean? Is gravity part of the "junk" you are dispensing with? The way you cover the land is to raise the level of the ocean until it covers up all the land. That means you have to (duh) raise the level of the ocean.
actually, we see water do that quite often on a small scale......and if you recall...the Bible does note that the waters recede again.
see the above for actual science that proves your posts conveying very little knowledge of the subject at hand. Water going "uphill" as it were....so, a proven (and simple enough for you) example that contradicts your very assertion. Not to mention the Jupiter effect...etc....
Point being, your posts, assumptions, and model are primitive and without a basic understanding of actual science. It is as if you think science is a third grade class room and all you have to do is dazzle people with baking soda and vinegar....takes more than a bic lighter to impress this caveman.
Your arrogance is holding you down while actual "modern" science floats farther up and away from you.
I said the way you cover the land is to change the level of the oceans. That's exactly what tides do -- change the level of the oceans. From low tide to high tide, the sea level rises and the water covers more land. From high to low tide, the sea level falls and the water covers less land. Your example of tides simply confirms the accuracy of what I said.
wow...you actually answered....no wonder you do not know how the flood occurred....