Fence Sitter wrote:honorentheos wrote:Mainly, I'm wondering about Ceeboo's personal thoughts. He's been given 5 pages of information that ranged from the analytical to some that are almost folksy. And yet his question from the OP remained: does being anti-Mormonism make him anti-Mormon? Since no one on the board seems to be able to answer the question for him in a way that has satisfied him, it seems he's going to have to answer the question for himself. If he wants to share the answer, cool. If he doesn't want to share it, that's cool too.
I don't know if Ceeboo is satisfied with the answers given or not but it seems clear the answer depends on the definition of 'anti-mormon(ism)', which varies from person to person.
For example in my opinion being anti-Mormonism makes him anti-Mormon, because Mormonism is an integral part of being Mormon.
Mormons try and make the same distinction with homosexuals and homosexual behavior. In other words it's okay to be gay but not act gay. Is that an anti-gay stance or just an anti-gay behavior stance? Can you separate the person from his actions and condemn the later without condemning the former? I don't think so.
I think that equating criticism of a religious belief with criticism of the person who has adopted the belief varies widely. I see it very rarely in mainstream American Catholics and Protestants. I see it much more among LDS, JW's, and fundamentalist christians.