More lying from Le Grand Richards and POGP

[_Albion]

You take the biscuit, Bhodi.. which part of "my only point" did you not understand. You are still still defending your attack on the poster rather than the statements posted and touting your own intellectual superiority as if it alone qualifies your remarks and provides an answer. If Mittens' posts are so below your ivory tower ignore them and move on to other things. Is that so hard to do on a public message board which is designed to accommodate a range of views. I note, too, that you failed to respond with any grace to your own grammatical failing after spending so much time on the failings of others in this area. No one here has a corner on grammar.

[_Bhodi]

You take the biscuit, Bhodi.. which part of "my only point" did you not understand. You are still still defending your attack on the poster

But no one is attacking Mittens. Mittens did no research. She did no work. She put in no effort. Her whole blog, if you read it, is plagiarism. None of this is an attack, it is an observation. It is all, unfortunately, true.

rather than the statements posted and touting your own intellectual superiority as if it alone qualifies your remarks and provides an answer.

So since Mittens has done no work, someone who has done ANY work would have done more than her, so it is hardly intellectual superiority. It is more research, however.

If Mittens' posts are so below your ivory tower ignore them and move on to other things.

Now NOT plagiarizing is ivory tower level discourse?

Is that so hard to do on a public message board which is designed to accommodate a range of views.

This is supposed to be a scholarly forum and you are upset that someone finds a problem with rampant plagiarism?

I note, too, that you failed to respond with any grace to your own grammatical failing after spending so much time on the failings of others in this area. No one here has a corner on grammar.

The point of the grammar issue was that it made the plagiarism so blatantly obvious. There is a night and day difference between Mittens' original work, what little of it there is, and the majority of her cut and paste.

So why have you abandoned any sense of ethicality, morality, and scholarship, all because you really do not like Mormons and are willing to sacrifice morals and ethics for your prejudices. It is also shoddy cut and paste, her sources are terrible, and this is by Evangelical Christians’ own assessments.

But the real issue is why you think other people should waste their time when Mittens clearly has no respect for her own opinions? If she is not willing to do any work, why should she be validated with a response?

[_Albion]

Bhodi, despite your renewed personal attacks on me, I have stated everything I wish to say on this topic. You are free to conclude anything you wish from this decision.

[_Bhodi]

Bhodi, despite your renewed personal attacks on me, I have stated everything I wish to say on this topic. You are free to conclude anything you wish from this decision.

What personal attacks? You excused dishonesty, unethicality, and depending on your bent, immorality because the ends, attacking Mormons, justified the means. This is not an attack, you actually did it all.