Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _subgenius »

Nelson Chung wrote:Henry Eyring:

“Probably one of the most difficult problems in reading the scriptures is to decide what is to be taken literally and what is fiction.”

it seems that Dr Shades was asking for examples, not a reiteration of his question.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _Bazooka »

subgenius wrote:Dr Shades asked for an explanation not an opinion.


I don't recall Shades asking for a board nanny...
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_nc47
_Emeritus
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:52 am

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _nc47 »

moksha wrote:
Nelson Chung wrote:Have you taken a physics class at BYU? Or a biology class? If not, I'd happily tell you about it: YOU'RE WRONG.


The Mxyzptlkian dimensional paradox mechanism or taking a class at BYU?


I don't even know what that is.
"It is so hard to believe because it is so hard to obey." - Soren Kierkegaard
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _Dr. Shades »

subgenius wrote:it seems that Dr Shades was asking for examples, not a reiteration of his question.

You are indeed correct.

Nelson Chung graciously provided us with an example of an apostle addressing a group of college students in 1933, giving them license to take the first several verses of Genesis, chapter 1 as allegory.

Okay, so the creation of heaven, earth, and mankind as recited in the Bible is allegory. . . assuming no other apostles or prophets disagree with the apostle that Nelson Chung quoted.

Somehow I get the impression that Moksha thinks that many, many more scriptural accounts other than the first few verses of Genesis chapter 1 are allegorical (correct me if I'm wrong, of course). Therefore, Mosha, which other accounts within LDS scriptures are merely allegorical and not to be taken literally? Backing up your list with quotations from General Authorities giving such license would be appreciated.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _moksha »

Shades, I didn't realize you hung on the words of the Authorities for confirmation. My statement, like all statements predicated on opinion, is my own. Maybe some LDS Authorities agree (at least clandestinely) or not. Never the less, the statement seems true to me. I see truths and wisdom in the Mormon canon, just as I see it in other allegory. Does this reflect a weak testimony on my part or a better understanding of the fundamental nature of such scriptures? Depends upon who you ask.

Did Jonah really get swallowed by a big fish or was this allegory? I think it was allegory, but you could always check with Authorities for a second opinion.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Mktavish
_Emeritus
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:23 am

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _Mktavish »

...
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _Dr. Shades »

moksha wrote:Shades, I didn't realize you hung on the words of the Authorities for confirmation. My statement, like all statements predicated on opinion, is my own.

You said, "Let our allegory be allegory, please. No fanciful defenses or tireless attacks are needed[.]"

"Our" implies some sort of universality or consensus. You didn't say, "Let my allegory be allegory, please. No fanciful defenses or tireless attacks on my allegory are needed[.]"

But now it seems like you're admitting that you've invented your own Mormonism, wherein you can dismiss the inconvenient, politically incorrect, or untrue parts as "allegory" and then get a free pass.

Maybe some LDS Authorities agree (at least clandestinely) or not. Never the less, the statement seems true to me. I see truths and wisdom in the Mormon canon, just as I see it in other allegory.

What truths and wisdom do you see? Please be specific.

Did Jonah really get swallowed by a big fish or was this allegory? I think it was allegory, but you could always check with Authorities for a second opinion.

Jonah getting swallowed by a fish was an allegory for. . . what, exactly?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_tagriffy
_Emeritus
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 2:52 am

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _tagriffy »

It's an allegory for, "If you run away from God, you're going to wind up in a really stinky place." :D
Timothy A. Griffy
http://tagriffy.blogspot.com/

Be the kind of person your dog thinks you are.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _moksha »

Dr. Shades wrote:
"Our" implies some sort of universality or consensus. You didn't say, "Let my allegory be allegory, please. No fanciful defenses or tireless attacks on my allegory are needed[.]"


No way. Using the word our simply meant including myself in joint ownership of this allegory. I purchased my copy the same as everyone else (well, some get it handed to them for free as part of a sales promotional).

But now it seems like you're admitting that you've invented your own Mormonism, wherein you can dismiss the inconvenient, politically incorrect, or untrue parts as "allegory" and then get a free pass.


Hey, I didn't write these books, so I didn't invent them. They and the stories of Asgard and Olympus existed before I was born. If you wish to imbue any allegory with more significance, that is fine with me. I prefer to take what good I can from them and appreciate them as allegory. I do however recognize that for my faith, the Mormon canon should be regarded as Sacred Allegory, which is a step up from plain old everyday run of the mill allegory.


What truths and wisdom do you see? Please be specific.


You need to ask this question of some British school lad who is into recitation.


Jonah getting swallowed by a fish was an allegory for. . . what, exactly?


Whatever abstract ideas you would like to read into it. I like the one about how no matter what gridlock we are trapped in on the freeway, we will eventually get home so we can watch the Colbert Report at 8 PM.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_karl61
_Emeritus
Posts: 2983
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Let our Allegory be Allegory, please.

Post by _karl61 »

I think it gets complicated since there are three different accounts in Genesis of what happens in the beginning. It's like E.Poe, J.Smith and T.Jefferson all wrote their version and a group at Harvard in 2013 used a cut and paste of all three to create an account of what happened.
I want to fly!
Post Reply