For Maklelan

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: For Maklelan

Post by _subgenius »

Bazooka wrote:
The statements by Elder Cannon and Elder Roberts are not doctrinal and cannot therefore be accepted as valid references.

huh? now your posts seem drunk.
Church policies do not have to be "doctrinal"....perhaps you are confused....however, ironically, common consent has occurred on each policy.

Bazooka wrote:D&C 28:13 13 For all things must be done in order, and by common consent in the church, by the prayer of faith.

obviously this is "doctrinal", therefore must be taken as valid, and confirms the previously stated position.
thank you

Bazooka wrote:Also

nothing to be taken from treasury except by voice or common consent of order: D&C 104:64, 71–72 .


When did the Church vote on spending the money on City Creek?

CFR on money taken from the "treasury" you reference.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: For Maklelan

Post by _Fence Sitter »

subgenius wrote:
Fence Sitter wrote:So how was the process of common consent Sub is describing followed when the Lectures on Faith were removed from the canon?

when the church removed them they explained that the LoF were never presented as being divinely revealed scripture.


Can you point me to where that was said?

And if it was never presented as such then you have just moved the problem to when it was part of the canon. So if you are correct then why was it accepted as part of the canon without being presented? Either way it didn't follow the method you describe and yet was part of the canon.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: For Maklelan

Post by _Bazooka »

subgenius wrote:CFR on money taken from the "treasury" you reference.


At the beginning, President Gordon B. Hinckley (1910-2008), leader of the Church at the time City Creek Center was announced, said of the proposed development, “Renewed vitality at the head of Main Street will result in increased vitality throughout the entire city. We of the Church have wanted to keep our city youthful and attractive. People come here to Temple Square from all over the world in ever-increasing numbers, and it is important that we keep the Square and its environs beautiful and inviting.”

President Eyring said, “Everything we see around us is evidence of the longstanding commitment of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to Salt Lake City. The Church’s unwavering commitment to this community is enduringly expressed in the resources provided to renew and revitalize here in the heart of the city.”

http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/c ... talization

Church funds.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_nc47
_Emeritus
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:52 am

Re: For Maklelan

Post by _nc47 »

Fence Sitter wrote:
Nelson Chung wrote:I assume he decided to accept the PhD candidacy at Oxford so he doesn't have time to reply to internet message boards anymore?

He has been active in threads today in the Terrestrial forum.

I guess he turned it down.
"It is so hard to believe because it is so hard to obey." - Soren Kierkegaard
Post Reply