marquis de sade

[_subgenius]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."

resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.


agree or disagree?

[_Res Ipsa]

Disagree, of course. It is with God that all things are permissible. Read your Old Testament.

[_Bazooka]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."

resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.


agree or disagree?

What's your position, do you agree or disagree?

[_subgenius]

Disagree, of course. It is with God that all things are permissible. Read your Old Testament.

covering your bases?
so, either way we have the right to bend women to our will.

[_The Erotic Apologist]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

Nevertheless, Subby cannot provide evidence that de Sade was in reality describing Mormon polygamy...

[_subgenius]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."

resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.


agree or disagree?

What's your position, do you agree or disagree?

[_subgenius]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

Nevertheless, Subby cannot provide evidence that de Sade was in reality describing Mormon polygamy...

[_Res Ipsa]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."

resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.


agree or disagree?

What's your position, do you agree or disagree?

I have it on good authority that if Subby actually states a firm position on any topic, the universe will implode.

[_subgenius]

I have it on good authority that if Subby actually states a firm position on any topic, the universe will implode.

your concern is admirable, but it does not clarify what keeps you from subscribing to Sade's philosophy above.

[_The Erotic Apologist]

Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.

"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."

resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.

agree or disagree?

What's your position, do you agree or disagree?

Yeah Subby, what's your position? Do you agree or disagree?

Or shall we assume your preferred position is The Congress of the Cow?