The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

Brackite wrote:Here is the biggest contradiction within the LDS Scriptures:

Jacob 2:

[23] But the word of God burdens me because of your grosser crimes. For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing whoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son.

[24] Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord.

[25] Wherefore, thus saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of Joseph.

[26] Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this people shall do like unto them of old.

[27] Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife; and concubines he shall have none;

[28] For I, the Lord God, delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts.

[/color]


Let's stop there for a second. ... No wait. Let's continue:

29 Wherefore, this people shall keep my commandments, saith the Lord of Hosts, or cursed be the land for their sakes.
30 For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; OTHERWISE they shall hearken unto these things.


The problem was when people did it for their own selfish reasons. Can you honestly tell me that you weren't aware of the next two verses in the context?

C'mon man. Just because you may go unchallenged on this forum from time to time does not mean that there are no answers to your accusations. It is just that you are not willing to listen to the answers anyways, so people often won't spend the time to explain it to you for fear of wasting their time.

Here is a full treatment of the topic.
http://www.fairmormon.org/perspectives/ ... and_dc_132

-7up
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

Mittens wrote:"God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted Man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens. That is the great secret... … I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the veil, so that you may see. … It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the character of God and to know...that he was once a man like us.... Here, then, is eternal life - to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be Gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all Gods have done before you... (“King Follett Discourse,” Journal of Discourses 6:3-4, also in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 345-346, and History of the Church, vol. 6, 305-307,)"


Just for fun, let's discuss the definition of “eternal”. Do you want to use a specific option in the definitions found in modern dictionaries? Or do you want to look at the words as they were used and understood in ancient times as written in the Bible?

Perhaps your view of "eternal" is that only God is eternal, existing in some kind of simple (no parts), metaphysical, unchanging state from infinite past to infinite future, existing before anything else ever existed. However, those are leaps beyond how the Bible uses “eternal”.

All that can be said of the scriptural usage of these terms (everlasting/eternal) is that whatever is called “eternal” goes beyond our usual sense or scope of existence or beyond our experience of time. The ancient authors wrote to an audience according to their understanding, which is limited. Our understanding is limited as well. Time is relative, and anything outside time as we currently know it is beyond the human experience. We think that living 100 years is a long time. Imagine living 100 thousand or 100 million years. It is unthinkable in relation to what we see in our mortality.

God is well beyond even billions and billions of years. How can we even fathom that? Having created the Universe and time as we know it, God transcends time in our Universe, and, if we want to speculate, He may very well have created another Universe or Universes (which would more correctly be related to a term called “Multiverse”). But that is another discussion and certainly falls under speculation beyond scripture and defined doctrine.

Anyways, here are a few Old Testament examples of two terms which are sometimes translated as everlasting/eternal. Let's see if they fit into what you are implying to mean as “eternal”:

עוֹלָם `owlam

Deut 33:15 describes the hills/mountains as "everlasting/eternal". Yet clearly the Bible teaches that the Earth along with the hills and mountains were created.

This is the same term used in the Psalms for God being “from everlasting to everlasting”. Yet most of the time we find this word translated as “ancient”. Other examples include “ancient people” (Isa 44:7), ancient landmark (Prov 22:28), and so forth.

Similarly, we have the Hebrew wordעַד `ad
Job 20:4 "Haven't you known this from ***everlasting/eternal***, since mankind was placed on the earth?

So here, having known since the beginning of the Earth is sufficient to be considered eternal/everlasting. The meaning is "antiquity or of old'. (Interesting also that Isaiah uses this same term in 57:15 to say that God “inhabits eternity.” Almost as if eternity can also be considered a place.)

Keep in mind that this is the same term that is used in Isaiah 9:6 for the “everlasting/eternal Father”.

Lets look at some New Testament words, like Ἀΐδιος aïdios

Jude 1:6 uses the term to describe “everlasting chains” for the angels who “kept not their first estate” which they will have “unto the judgement of the great day.” So, did these chains under darkness exist before God supposedly created everything Ex Nihilo, including the angels themselves?

Yet this term is the same word used to describe God's “eternal power and Godhead” in Romans 1:20.

How about another term, from which we get aeon. Αἰών Aiōn

Sometimes this one it is not just understood as long periods of time, but as “the worlds” or the Cosmos/Universe, which, as we both know, are created by God, so does not really fit your definition of something that always has been.

Finally, we have χρόνος and Αἰώνιος aiōnios ,

It is used over and over to describe both eternal salvation/redemption/inheritance as well as eternal judgment/fire/destruction.

It is also used to describe a whole host of other things, like the “eternal weight of glory” to be bestowed upon the faithful. It is used by Paul to describe an “everlasting covenant” between God and man. It is used in conjunction with another Hebrew term to say “since the world began”. It as also used to things that will exist in the future, for example, when comparing our earthly tabernacle, which is temporal, to the tabernacle we will have in the resurrection. (2 Cr 5:1).

So, again I ask you, is your definition of “eternal” consistent with how these terms were used and understood in ancient scripture? Or are you adding meaning beyond what the scripture actually says?

Have you weighed all of this against what Joseph Smith was trying to explain in relation to God?

-7up
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _ludwigm »

seven7up wrote:Here is a full treatment of the topic.
http://www.fairmormon.org/perspectives/ ... and_dc_132
Full treatment :lol: .

"Contradiction between Jacob and D&C 132" ? Yes, there IS contradiction.
Then fairmormons explain this - among others - with 2 Samuel 12:7-8.
" And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, "
That verse, instead of solving the contradiction, creates a new. Jacob "For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife;" contradicts 2 Sam 12:8.

And it continues with many biblical citations, which themselves contradict each other.
Apparently, any contradicting scripture can be explained away with other contradicting scriptures.

.

For me this is the crown of the torte: (highlights are as in original fair thing)
Jacob 2:30 For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; OTHERWISE they shall hearken unto these things. (not the moderator rrrrred...)

Their plural wives and concubines were an abomination in that not all of them were approved by the Lord.
This is the key. If I, The Immutable And Unchangeable LORD (who was developed from a man...) am commanding something to you (or at least some self-appointed prophet said I commanded it...), something against My Previous Command, then follow it.

The well known two-rule system:
Rule 1. The boss God is always right.
Rule 2. If the boss God is wrong, use Rule1.


seven7up wrote:Image Faithful and wrong answers...
.
Next time try it with Jeff Lindsay!
Image
.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _Bazooka »

seven7up wrote:Have you weighed all of this against what Joseph Smith was trying to explain in relation to God?

-7up


Why are you trying to reinterpret what Joseph Smith clearly and explicitly stated - "God was once a man like us....".
I interpret that to mean that God was once a man like us. Which supports the Mormon notion that we can become God's.

Are you saying you don't think the teaching on this is correct?
Blessings of Exaltation
•What are some blessings that will be given to those who are exalted?
Our Heavenly Father is perfect, and He glories in the fact that it is possible for His children to become like Him. His work and glory is “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39).

Those who receive exaltation in the celestial kingdom through faith in Jesus Christ will receive special blessings. The Lord has promised, “All things are theirs” (D&C 76:59). These are some of the blessings given to exalted people:

1. They will live eternally in the presence of Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ (see D&C 76:62).
2. They will become gods (see D&C 132:20–23).
3. They will be united eternally with their righteous family members and will be able to have eternal increase.
4. They will receive a fulness of joy.
5. They will have everything that our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ have—all power, glory, dominion, and knowledge (see D&C 132:19–20). President Joseph Fielding Smith wrote: “The Father has promised through the Son that all that he has shall be given to those who are obedient to His commandments. They shall increase in knowledge, wisdom, and power, going from grace to grace, until the fulness of the perfect day shall burst upon them” (Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols. [1954–56], 2:36; italics in original).

http://www.LDS.org/manual/gospel-princi ... n?lang=eng

D&C 132
20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have all power, and the angels are subject unto them.

21 Verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye abide my law ye cannot attain to this glory.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

ludwigm wrote:"Contradiction between Jacob and D&C 132" ? Yes, there IS contradiction.


There is not a contradiction when you read the WHOLE discussion in the chapter written by Jacob. God says IF God wills, or if God has good reason, then he will command it. God is saying that different situations may actually call for polygamy, but for the most part, the standard rule is one wife.

ludwigm wrote:Then fairmormons explain this - among others - with 2 Samuel 12:7-8.
" And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, "
That verse, instead of solving the contradiction, creates a new. Jacob "For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife;" contradicts 2 Sam 12:8.


Again, it is not a contradiction. The Book of Mormon text says that one wife is the standard, but in different situations there may be polygamy in specific times if God commands it.

Even killing another human being can be categorized in this way. There are some situations where killing another man may be justified. Do you disagree?

-7up
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

Bazooka wrote: Why are you trying to reinterpret what Joseph Smith clearly and explicitly stated - "God was once a man like us....".
I interpret that to mean that God was once a man like us. Which supports the Mormon notion that we can become God's.
Are you saying you don't think the teaching on this is correct?


Bazooka,

If you can, why don't you post Joseph Smith's quote in its context? Can you? I will refrain from commenting further until you show some intellectual honesty.

Furthermore, since you know so much about it. Joseph said he could demonstrate this concept from the Bible. Do you know which Biblical verse he was referring to?

-7up
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _Bazooka »

seven7up wrote:
Bazooka wrote: Why are you trying to reinterpret what Joseph Smith clearly and explicitly stated - "God was once a man like us....".
I interpret that to mean that God was once a man like us. Which supports the Mormon notion that we can become God's.
Are you saying you don't think the teaching on this is correct?


Bazooka,

If you can, why don't you post Joseph Smith's quote in its context? Can you? I will refrain from commenting further until you show some intellectual honesty.

Furthermore, since you know so much about it. Joseph said he could demonstrate this concept from the Bible. Do you know which Biblical verse he was referring to?

-7up


7up, I quoted you from the LDS manual Gospel Principles.
Here it is, quoted directly from the manual:
The Lord has said, “If you keep my commandments and endure to the end you shall have eternal life, which gift is the greatest of all the gifts of God” (D&C 14:7). President Joseph Fielding Smith said, “If we will continue in God; that is, keep his commandments, worship him and live his truth; then the time will come when we shall be bathed in the fulness of truth, which shall grow brighter and brighter until the perfect day” (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:36).

The Prophet Joseph Smith taught: “When you climb up a ladder, you must begin at the bottom, and ascend step by step, until you arrive at the top; and so it is with the principles of the gospel—you must begin with the first, and go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. But it will be a great while after you have passed through the veil [died] before you will have learned them. It is not all to be comprehended in this world; it will be a great work to learn our salvation and exaltation even beyond the grave” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith [2007], 268).

Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God. … He was once a man like us; … God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 345–46).

Our Heavenly Father knows our trials, our weaknesses, and our sins. He has compassion and mercy on us. He wants us to succeed even as He did.


Are you saying the Church hasn't been intellectually honest with its members?
Arte you saying this official Church manual has taken Joseph Smith's words out of context?
Are you saying the teaching that this official teaching, that we can become God's, is wrong?

Now here's the problem you've created for yourself. You called me intellectually dishonest for portraying the quote as I did. Unfortunately for you I was merely portraying it the way the Church officially teaches it in the Gospel Principles manual. It is an inescapable conclusion therefore, that you have just called the Church intellectually dishonest. Whoops.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_CameronMO
_Emeritus
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:27 am

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _CameronMO »

Bazooka wrote:Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God. … He was once a man like us; … God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 345–46).

Brother Brigham, is that you? :lol:
Bazooka wrote:Now here's the problem you've created for yourself. You called me intellectually dishonest for portraying the quote as I did. Unfortunately for you I was merely portraying it the way the Church officially teaches it in the Gospel Principles manual. It is an inescapable conclusion therefore, that you have just called the Church intellectually dishonest. Whoops.

Ouch.
:twisted:
:lol:
Trimble, you ignorant sack of rhinoceros puss. The only thing more obvious than your lack of education is the foul stench that surrounds you.
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

Bazooka wrote:Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God. … He was once a man like us; … God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 345–46).


Again, I take it that neither of you can provide for me the words that fit in after this: " He was once a man like us; …"

Please tell me. What was said right after that (and before it)? What was taken out of that quote? What was the context?

While I let you look that up, consider the following:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The term “gods” is used in at least 3 different ways in scripture.

1) God (as in Elohim – the plural Hebrew term which refers to the true God and is used to describe the Deity of the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit)

2 ) men who have been given authority to act and judge on behalf of God or in the name of God

3) false gods (false idols)

So, often LDS are accused of believing in the “plurality of gods”, which is true in a certain sense, but it is a loaded statement; one that needs to be explained in much more detail.

My understanding of “polytheism” is a system of worship whereby one worships a different being depending on what they are looking for. If you want help with your crops, you worship that god. If you want help with war, you worship another god. Etc.

Mormons will say they “worship God the Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit” and that is how they worship, period. I don't think that is the same as polytheism. I suppose that Henotheism is an acceptable term for Mormons, especially when you consider the 3 different scriptural uses for the term "gods" seen above as well as other aspects of Mormon theology.

LDS will also say that even though each of these persons are distinct individual beings, “these three are one God.” Therefore, I believe that being “one God” is not meant to be taken as a literal “metaphysical oneness of being”. Nor is it meant to say that no other persons exist who can hold the title of god. Scripture says they can.

-7up
Last edited by Guest on Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
_seven7up
_Emeritus
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:15 pm

Re: The Book of Mormon contridicts Mormonism

Post by _seven7up »

Bazooka wrote:Are you saying the Church hasn't been intellectually honest with its members?
Arte you saying this official Church manual has taken Joseph Smith's words out of context?
Are you saying the teaching that this official teaching, that we can become God's, is wrong?

Now here's the problem you've created for yourself. You called me intellectually dishonest for portraying the quote as I did. Unfortunately for you I was merely portraying it the way the Church officially teaches it in the Gospel Principles manual. It is an inescapable conclusion therefore, that you have just called the Church intellectually dishonest. Whoops.


No, FIRST you took the quote out of context. Furthermore, I am saying that you draw conclusions beyond what the manuals say , and beyond what Joseph Smith taught originally. You are essentially trying to argue that LDS doctrine teaches that God the Father was a man like us in the sense that God was a sinner, ... supposedly.

Here was your original statement:
Bazooka wrote:Why are you trying to reinterpret what Joseph Smith clearly and explicitly stated - "God was once a man like us....".
I interpret that to mean that God was once a man like us. Which supports the Mormon notion that we can become God's.


Here was mittens doing the exact same kind of chop job and leaving important parts of the quote out.
Bazooka wrote: It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the character of God and to know...that he was once a man like us.... Here, then, is eternal life -


Let me inform you about more of the context of that statement. ... In general, Joseph Smith brings in the idea that Jesus Christ is following the same path that God the Father did. This has been taught repeatedly by LDS leaders. The scripture Joseph is referencing is John 5:19:

"I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever the Father doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise."

Joseph says, that (like Jesus) God the Father is an exalted man in form and appearance, "If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by His power, was to make himself visible—I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form—like yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as a man; for Adam was created in the very fashion, image and likeness of God, and received instruction from, and walked, talked and conversed with Him, as one man talks and communes with another."

When you first posted the phrase "God was once a man like us...." , then you were being intellectually dishonest because it clearly leaves out the idea that Joseph was teaching that God was a man "like us" only in the same sense that Jesus Christ was a man "like us". He said:

"we may converse with Him as one man converses with another, and that He was once a man like us; yea, that God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ Himself did;"

So, keep in mind that Joseph was not teaching that we are the same as God in all respects.

Oh, and another misconception pushed by detractors of the LDS faith is the idea that God the Father is only the God of this Earth. However, many LDS scriptures clearly teach otherwise.

-7up
Post Reply