Mittens wrote:Todays sermon was on Sennacherib's Prism that can be found in London Museum where we can verify the Biblical story of Hezekiah and Sennacherib, but no artifacts from the Book of Mormon have ever been found
Which version of the biblical story of Hezekiah and Sennacherib? There's the one where Hezekiah just pays Sennacherib and he leaves, then there are the two others where he refuses to pay him and Sennacherib besieges the city. Also, there's nothing in Sennacherib's prism or in any other text from the time period that at all lends support to the notion that an angel swooped down and killed hundreds of thousands of them. So, what you're left with is a historical artifact that shows Sennacherib did in fact lay siege to Jerusalem, and a biblical text with three different versions of the same story that totally contradict each other and with one that ends with an enormous slaughter that obviously never happened. How does this make the Bible better than the Book of Mormon?
So you have no defense, you just dodge the issue altogether?
Fortunately the Bible has historical proof of it's existence, The Book of Mormon has none. Of course the Word of God is different than sennacherib's since he doesn't want to admit how his army was completely taken out by God's army of angels
Mittens wrote:Fortunately the Bible has historical proof of it's existence,
The Bible has historical proof of the Bible's existence? Wouldn't the existence of the Bible be, in and of itself, proof of its existence? If you mean to say that it has historical proof of the events described in the Bible, then you need to pay better attention, because I'm pointing out precisely how many of the events of the Bible are actually flatly precluded by the historical evidence.
Mittens wrote:The Book of Mormon has none.
That was never the question.
Mittens wrote:Of course the Word of God is different than sennacherib's since he doesn't want to admit how his army was completely taken out by God's army of angels
Not only is that nothing more than "Nu-uh!" but I've explained in detail that the biblical accounts of the events are multiple and contradictory. How many times do you think you can completely ignore what I'm actually saying before you have no one left listening to anything you say?
