mormonstories wrote:Quasimodo - Honest question. If someone is repeatedly slandering another publicly...by name, in this forum, without offering any evidence for their accusations -- is it wrong (by this forum's standards) to expose the in real life identities of that person?
Ya murdered the standard ... can't wait for the "was jd's punishment too little/much" days to follow.
The in real life names will be struck soon enough ... but its like pulling the nails out of the board ... the holes are still there! ... oh wait seems something was wrong with that analogy?
thumbs up for setting the record straight and hopefully defusing these individuals from continued slander in the future.
First in!!!!
LD$inc will not permaban JD, will MDD?
classy. super classy.
"Rocks don't speak for themselves" is an unfortunate phrase to use in defense of a book produced by a rock actually 'speaking' for itself... (I have a Question, 5.15.15)
Scratch and Pinkeman are going to have to go some to top this thread!
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Ceeboo wrote:Without question or exception, yes! Under any circumstance, it is entirely wrong!
Period.
Now go in peace my friend - and sin no more!
(Should you have any further questions, please feel free to skip Quasimodo - and ask me directly)
Peace, Ceeboo
What?! Skip Quasimodo? I'm appalled!
In retaliation I want you all to know that Ceeboo is actually Pope Francis in real live.
I can corroborate this as I've seen his car.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
mormonstories wrote:Quasimodo - Honest question. If someone is repeatedly slandering another publicly...by name, in this forum, without offering any evidence for their accusations -- is it wrong (by this forum's standards) to expose the in real life identities of that person?
Ya murdered the standard ... can't wait for the "was jd's punishment too little/much" days to follow.
The in real life names will be struck soon enough ... but its like pulling the nails out of the board ... the holes are still there! ... oh wait seems something was wrong with that analogy?
thumbs up for setting the record straight and hopefully defusing these individuals from continued slander in the future.
First in!!!!
LD$inc will not permaban JD, will MDB?
Nice. A potential co-defendant. Care to specify who you think slandered whom? I am dying to see your evidence.
"The Church is authoritarian, tribal, provincial, and founded on a loosely biblical racist frontier sex cult."--Juggler Vain "The LDS church is the Amway of religions. Even with all the soap they sell, they still manage to come away smelling dirty."--Some Schmo
Bazooka wrote:Scratch and Pinkeman are going to have to go some to top this thread!
or maybe that blood in the streets, finally.
"Rocks don't speak for themselves" is an unfortunate phrase to use in defense of a book produced by a rock actually 'speaking' for itself... (I have a Question, 5.15.15)
Equality wrote:Nice. A potential co-defendant. Care to specify who you think slandered whom? I am dying to see your evidence.
In contrast to a long history of MDB threatened lawsuits, JD's simply facing up directly with the individuals in hopes of resolving what has become a long history of stalking and slander is what wins my thumbs up.
I've not seen any threat of suit ... until your post.
Equality wrote:Nice. A potential co-defendant. Care to specify who you think slandered whom? I am dying to see your evidence.
In contrast to a long history of MDB threatened lawsuits, JD's simply facing up directly with the individuals in hopes of resolving what has become a long history of stalking and slander is what wins my thumbs up.
I've not seen any threat of suit ... until your post.
I've not seen anything than bogus allegations of slander. Care to point out any slanderous statement in any of my posts, Rock? You make conclusory allegations without citing any evidence. If you are going to defend mormonstories' "retaliatory" name-dropping on the grounds that the folks he named had slandered him here, surely it will not be difficult for you to point out which statements are allegedly slanderous.
Edited to change initials of real name to "mormonstories."
Last edited by Guest on Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:14 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The Church is authoritarian, tribal, provincial, and founded on a loosely biblical racist frontier sex cult."--Juggler Vain "The LDS church is the Amway of religions. Even with all the soap they sell, they still manage to come away smelling dirty."--Some Schmo
Equality wrote:Nice. A potential co-defendant. Care to specify who you think slandered whom? I am dying to see your evidence.
In contrast to a long history of MDB threatened lawsuits, JD's simply facing up directly with the individuals in hopes of resolving what has become a long history of stalking and slander is what wins my thumbs up.
I've not seen any threat of suit ... until your post.
Facing up directly? He seems to have skedaddled as soon as I asked him to point out which of my statements he considered slanderous before he posted my real name multiple times in this thread. It would be nice if he would actually answer the question put to him. But based on long years of experience with him, I am dubious that he will actually face me up directly. He doesn't really like to engage in discussions where he doesn't have total control. He can't ban from here the way he can in his Facebook groups, for example. And he can't get the thread locked here or my posts deleted the way he can at the NOM board. So he comes in full of bombast, goes nuclear with the name-dropping, plays the pity card, and walks away.
"The Church is authoritarian, tribal, provincial, and founded on a loosely biblical racist frontier sex cult."--Juggler Vain "The LDS church is the Amway of religions. Even with all the soap they sell, they still manage to come away smelling dirty."--Some Schmo
