LittleNipper wrote:Because what GOD reveals is truth He is not the puppet of one "educated" individual's mindset...
Nope--this has nothing to do with Yahweh's fetish for primitive tribesmen obsessed with human sacrifice and bodily fluids. You're dodging the question.
Why do these simple, straightforward questions frighten you?
LittleNipper wrote:---- such as a ""Mohamed" or a "Joseph Smith"...
Wrong--you're conflating evidence with proof. HINT: The dictionary is your friend.
The fact that Jesus may have existed doesn't mean he's a superhero.
LittleNipper wrote:The Apostle Paul said, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God (God-breathed) ..."
"God-breathed"? Does that have something to do with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation?
What's the point of calling it "God's word" if he neither wrote nor dictated it?
The Erotic Apologist wrote: What makes your mythology better than theirs? I wrote: A real person in the Lord Jesus Christ. The Erotic Apologist wrote: Because that's what the Bible says?
I've proven that Jesus was a real person unlike Clark Kent. If you wish to spit in the face of God, I'm not going to assist you in that quest.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
LittleNipper wrote:The Erotic Apologist wrote: What makes your mythology better than theirs? I wrote: A real person in the Lord Jesus Christ. The Erotic Apologist wrote: Because that's what the Bible says?
I've proven that Jesus was a real person unlike Clark Kent. If you wish to spit in the face of God, I'm not going to assist you in that quest.
Last edited by LittleNipper on Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
No--you've posted a link to some negligible evidence supporting a historical Jesus, but you've proven nothing.
To conflate evidence with proof is less than honest.
Nipper, why do certain Christians find it necessary to use deception in order to propagate their faith?
Here's a familiar example of what I'm talking about:
Surprise, surprise, there is no divine mandate for the Church to discuss and portray its history accurately. --Yahoo Bot
I pray thee, sir, forgive me for the mess. And whether I shot first, I'll not confess. --Han Solo, from William Shakespeare's Star Wars
LittleNipper wrote:The Erotic Apologist wrote: What makes your mythology better than theirs? I wrote: A real person in the Lord Jesus Christ. The Erotic Apologist wrote: Because that's what the Bible says?
I've proven that Jesus was a real person unlike Clark Kent. If you wish to spit in the face of God, I'm not going to assist you in that quest.
Last edited by LittleNipper on Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
No--you've posted a link to some negligible evidence supporting a historical Jesus, but you've proven nothing.
To conflate evidence with proof is less than honest.
Nipper, why do certain Christians find it necessary to use deception in order to propagate their faith?
Here's a familiar example of what I'm talking about:
And if the hammer and its handle is recent, how did it come to be embedded in ancient rock? Does that mean that such ancient rock may not be as old as uniformitarians think? OR are you in error concerning the age of this hammer. Which is it? Why do evolutionists fail to mention the Creator? Do they use exclusion tactics to promote their own naturalist theories? Have uniformitarians proven with repeatable experimentation the "truth" of their declarations?