"I AM" vs "God is love"

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _Maksutov »

SPG wrote:
Maksutov wrote:
That's right, love equals gravity.

You should talk to Franktalk.


Who is Franktalk? The forum?

I wouldn't say "equals." Related.

I have my ideas of how the 5 superstring theories co-relate to God. The Super Gravity theory, just adds another dimension. But yeah, Super Gravity and Love, basically equal in my book. But each dimensions adds a layer of illusion.


Is this in the Marvel or the DC Universe? :lol: :lol: :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _SPG »

Maksutov wrote:Is this in the Marvel or the DC Universe? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Aww, you are just messing with me, I thought you were serious.

I was referring to the global science community.

Super Gravity Theory is the current flavor of Unified Theory. Scientists have been working on it since before Newton.

Recently, it was String Theory, then Super String Theory with 10 dimensions, but then there turned out to be 5 Super String Theories. Then there is Super Gravity Theory which incorporates the 5 Super Strings in 10 dimensions, but also adds another dimension, making Super Gravity in 11 dimensions. Of course, this is all math stuff and lacks any sort of life or personality of the theories.

Prophets, going back to the Sanskrit times, have talked of 12 dimensions putting beings like Christ, gods, masters, in the 10th and 11th dimensions.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _Maksutov »

SPG wrote:
Maksutov wrote:Is this in the Marvel or the DC Universe? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Aww, you are just messing with me, I thought you were serious.

I was referring to the global science community.

Super Gravity Theory is the current flavor of Unified Theory. Scientists have been working on it since before Newton.

Recently, it was String Theory, then Super Theory with 10 dimensions, but then there turned out to be 5 Super Theories. Then there is Super Gravity Theory which incorporates the 5 Super Strings in 10 dimension, but also adds another dimension, making Super Gravity in 11 dimensions. Of course, this is all math stuff and lacks any sort of life or personality of the theories.

Prophets, going back to the Sanskrit times, have talked of 12 dimensions putting beings like Christ, gods, masters, in the 10th and 11th dimensions.


Now who's messing around? :lol: :lol: :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _SPG »

Though I am the master of mess, that is not my intent in these posts.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _Maksutov »

I want to hear more about this:

"Prophets, going back to the Sanskrit times, have talked of 12 dimensions putting beings like Christ, gods, masters, in the 10th and 11th dimensions."
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _SPG »

To start, let me say that I have not done the personal scholarly research for this. The idea of the dimensions came to me through the new age ascended master teaching. It has a diverse history that was strongly influenced by Madame Blavatsky. The Gnostic Society use as many of her teachings. She got many of her teachings from the Tibetan and Russians.

I have done some of the work where are the Sanskrit about the primary substance that all things are created from. Known as the akashic records. Somewhere in all of that the idea of multiple dimensions came out. I like the idea and so accepted it but have not validated that it actually was part of Sanskrit teaching.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _Maksutov »

SPG wrote:To start, let me say that I have not done the personal scholarly research for this. The idea of the dimensions came to me through the new age ascended master teaching. It has a diverse history that was strongly influenced by Madame Blavatsky. The Gnostic Society use as many of her teachings. She got many of her teachings from the Tibetan and Russians.

I have done some of the work where are the Sanskrit about the primary substance that all things are created from. Known as the akashic records. Somewhere in all of that the idea of multiple dimensions came out. I like the idea and so accepted it but have not validated that it actually was part of Sanskrit teaching.


Have you been a part of Gudni's mystery school?
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _SPG »

Nope. You?
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _Maksutov »

SPG wrote:Nope. You?


I thought all you Ascended Masters knew each other. :wink:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: "I AM" vs "God is love"

Post by _SPG »

The master of mess isn't a recognized ascended master.

Though I still use some of the ideas and symbols, I was never part of any group. Like Mormonism, I find it interesting.

My quest for truth has ruined most of my faith, but I still see good and purpose in stuff.
Post Reply