bomgeography wrote:We have had this discussion a million times just check my post about DNA evidence.
We continue to have this discussion because your claims are false. Your posts are erroneous and racist and you have misrepresented DNA while insisting that the dating methods are deeply flawed.
Look at the DNA tapir there is no evidence that haplo group x was ever in Siberia Central Asia east Asia even Alaska this is not my problem it's there problem
bomgeography wrote: Look at the DNA tapir there is no evidence that haplo group x was ever in Siberia Central Asia east Asia even Alaska this is not my problem it's there problem
There is no problem. Consider that there is no evidence of haplogroup x2a in the Near East or anywhere else. You continue to disregard the ancient beginnings of haplogroup x2a and then try to pretend that it came to America in a migration less than 6,000 years ago while ignoring all other relevant facts. It is your problem because your claim is weak and flawed.
bomgeography wrote:You can't escape the fact that the closest genetic to Native American haplo group x is iran
Is this like "you can't escape the fact that the closest genetic [sic] to humans are chimps and bonobos?" Because though we are related we descended from neither.
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
So, you still ignore that Haplogroup X arrival in the Americas is long before Book of Mormon times. There are a couple of different ways they could have entered, but both are long before Book of Mormon times.
Whats worse is you keep quoting from sources that tell you it arrived far to long before Book of Mormon times.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tapirrider wrote:Haplogroup x2a is not found anywhere but in North America. Your claim of evidence is a failure.
You can't escape the fact that the closest genetic to Native American haplo group x is iran
And full circle. McKane's statement has been debunked most recently on page 2 of this thread. Here's just an excerpt worth posting since McKane keeps repeating his thoroughly discredited statements:
In the past, many scholars have pointed to a sometimes explicitly racist agenda behind the claims of diffusionists who argue that the glories of Native American civilizations were achieved only through borrowing from various Old World groups. .... However, the only support for this picture of Native American–Old World interactions two thousand years ago comes from resurrected frauds and distorted history. There is no credible archaeological or genetic evidence to suggest that any Old World peoples migrated to the Americas after the initial incursion from Siberia prior to the tentative forays of the Norse beginning at around 1000 CE other than limited contacts between Siberia and the American arctic. http://www.csicop.org/si/show/civilizat ... l_messages
This excerpt is from a three part series where academic researchers fully document the research that debunks ideas such as McKane's.
bomgeography wrote:You can't escape the fact that the closest genetic to Native American haplo group x is iran
Is this like "you can't escape the fact that the closest genetic [sic] to humans are chimps and bonobos?" Because though we are related we descended from neither.
Unfortunately for scientist DNA is the best advocate for a creator. Scientist do not know how DNA/Rna came to exist. It's essential for life but is so complex there is no reasonable explanation for the first DNA sequence came to exist by chance.
